You should care what his SLG is. SLG isn't just driving runners in, it's the ability to get around the bases without the help of your teammates. The more you can do that, the more likely you are to score. That's why Walker with a .350/.450 OBP/SLG is more valuable than Pierre putting up .365/.390. Sure Pierre steals more bases, but if we include that(which is unfair to begin with because a double is more valuable than a single and a steal) then his OBP should be deducted for his CS%. In addition to all of this, Pierre is coming off of the worst season of his career. Even at his best Pierre isn't great. He'll put up a decent OBP, but some of that is mitigated with his average to mediocre SB%; he is terrible at hitting for extra bases. He's not a good defender. I can probably name a half dozen players off the top of my head that could be or are available that would be as good or better options(Bradley, Michaels, Crisp, GMJ, Cameron, Giles). He shouldn't be a top priority. An average player doesn't put up 200 hits a year. I'm not saying Pierre is the best option out there. I'm saying he would help this team. I wouldn't say he isn't a good defender, yeah he has a weak arm. But he pretty good range in CF. a 74% SB% is mediocre? He still gets 50+ a year. Take your example about getting to second base, scoring position. Pierre had 19 doubles and 57 SB last year, in his down year. So he was responsible for gettin into scoring position 76 times. Walker had 25 doubles and 1 SB. Do the math, Pierre gets in to position to score a lot, I didn't even include his triples. I'm not trying to compare Walker to Pierre because they are totally different players, just used him as a refrence point. I think Pierre would be a good addition because of the reasons stated above. The Cubs have been terrible at scoring runs unless it comes form a HR. Getting Pierre, or guys like him would improve this offense. The problem is he was also thrown out 17 times stealing. Losing those 17 outs is barely worth the 57 stolen bases.