You're a pathetic idiot. I don't see a problem with the original statement?? Jehrico's a soldier. He can and should have a problem with that statement. So that means Jehrico shouldn't be angry at rapist soldiers? Jehrico wasn't a victim of the rape. He is a victim of the movie. Most people don't have enough energy to be angry at every bad thing everyone on earth does, so we stick to things that affect us and those close to us most of the time. But tell me, nilodnayr, just how angry are you at Robert Garrison? Feel free to vent. Of course, since you've never heard of this particular rapist until now, the answer is that you probably didn't feel any anger towards him at all. Since your statement was a Non sequitur to begin with (it's about degrees of anger/caring, not absolute existence of them), I'm not sure why I bothered. I'm glad Jericho isn't a victim of rape, thanks for clarifying that. How exactly is he a victim of the movie? Is he wrongly accused of committing a crime in the movie? I'm not angry at anyone at all. I'm not sure where you gleaned that from this thread. So, I guess this dude was a rapist. La dee freakin da, hes a terrible person. That doesn't mean that I think all soldiers are terrible people. Anyone who does take that away from the movie...well, my advice would be to not give a crap what those people think because they are obviously idiots. I'm not sure why you bothered either especially when there isn't a cogent argument made, but whatever. This started with Jericho not wanting Cuban to own the cubs because he doesn't have respect for him because he financed a movie about a soldier who raped someone. My point is that I don't care what political beliefs Cuban holds as long as it has nothing to do with him owning the Cubs. Then that evolved into who is to be angry at for Redacted...Cuban or Robert Garrison. Evidently, there is a debate there. :roll: I must be missing something.