Then I ask those people: what is to stop Williams from turning around and flipping Swisher for a better package in two years if that's the case? He's under contract for so long these arguments don't hold water. Williams can flip Swisher in 2 years for a better package, but in the meantime the Sox will finish 3rd or 4th with Swisher. In 2 years, the package they will have to get for Swisher will have to replace Thome, Dye, Vasquez, Cabrera, and an aging Konerko. As Phil Rogers (Yuch!) pointed out, the Swisher deal is great if you are contending in 2008 or you have a deep minor league system. Neither of those applies to the White Sox. In the meantime the Sox would not have made the playoffs with De Los Santos, Sweeney, and Gio, so whats the point of that arguement? In 2 years will they be better off with those guys than Swisher? Will they be able to trade those guys to replace their current players (although, Dye, Vazquez, Konerko are all under contract, in 2 years, they'll be well on their decline by then)? Swisher is a great deal because hes fills both of their needs. Hes a win now type guy (which they need to show to their owner/players/fans) and hes a win later type guy because hes young(ish) and under contract through 11 with a club option for 12. Plus its a good value deal, IMO. Criticize KW for not trading Dye, criticize KW for not trading Buehrle, criticize KW for not trading Garland for prospects, and the many other guys that he could have used to rebuild. Those are all valid, but this trade has NOTHING to do with any of that. I do not agree. He has now completely cleared his system of all value, and his team is still below par. He would need to continue to add established pitchers in order to get up into the Red Sox, Yankees, Tigers and Indians' class. He can't, so now they will wollow in the middle division with no help on the horizon. Had he kept his prospects he could have at least torn the house down and gone young rather than making a futile attempt to be competitive.