Sure, unless you're striking out on a pitch headed for the backstop, not much good comes from a K, since the pitcher isn't depending on anyone else to get you out. But it is still just one out. Yes, but if you put the ball in play, you have a chance of the defense messing up, and therefore something good happening out of it. The chances are slim, yes, but they're a hell of a lot better than if you strike out. so what? The rates that he produces at tells us what he produces, which is good, much better than the vast majority. It does not matter what could happen if he didn't strike out, what matters is what does happen. And what happens when Adam Dunn comes to the plate is a more than acceptable rate of success. The fascination with the strike out is so obnoxious. I'd still rather have a guy who makes the same number of outs, who is able to at least have productive outs.... move the runners over and such. A K isn't the end of the world, and given the choice I'd take a K over a DP, but excessive amounts of strikeouts hurt the team. Yes, he produces well, but he could produce much better if he didn't strike out so damn much.