Has he improved or has he just got more minutes and developed a rep, getting him more foul calls? He handles the ball a lot better than he did in college. But I think every other facet of his game has either regressed, or stayed the same. He averaged 35.6 minutes his rookie year which is also his career average so he hasn't gotten that many more minutes. He's added as many as 4.6 PPG more than his rookie year, dropped his TO/G by as much as 0.4 and has an increased his FG% by as much as .62%. In all 3 categories, he's still better this season than he was his rookie year. His APG has dropped steadily (but not too drastically) from his rookie year on. I wish I could get his PER numbers from before this season. Well his assists should go down this year. We have no inside scorer. Gordon has slumped. Deng has missed a lot of time. I guess the main thing that hurts Hinrich is the other guys in the draft being so good. Sucks we got the pick we did that year. He's still having his worst year since his rookie year. Of course so are Gordon and Deng. In terms of that draft, it did suck picking that low. At least it wasn't a case of Roy or Aldrige vs. Thomas. Hinrich was the best pick that year (ignoring trading possibilites, of course). At that time yeah. But I sure would rather have David West or Josh Howard now. The thing that's always driven me nuts about him (Kirk) is consistency. And this could be one of those BS, observational evaluations like "hustle," and if it is, please call me on it. But he seems so hit or miss to me, and he seems like a guy where, if he misses his first 2 shots, you know he'll have a 2-10 night. Like I said, that's a BS, statistically invalid, incorrect observation. That's just how it feels. I think he'd be better in a place where his scoring was "gravy." I also think it hurt him to be shuffled back and forth between 1-2. He's just doesn't have the skill-set to be a viable 2 IMO.