Agreed. To intentionally sit a player so an option doesn't vest is completely unethical. If the Cubs did this then no respectible free agent would consider them, they would be subject to grievances, and they would lose the support of this fan. OK, here are a couple of other reasons it would be wise to sit him: (a) We already have too many starting pitchers - Prior, Wood, Zambrano, Williams, Rusch, Mitre, Hill... the first three are clearly better than Maddux, and it can be argued that two of the last four are at least as good if not better than Maddux now. (b) Lots of teams play their young guys when they're out of the playoff race to determine which young guys will be able to contribute to the team in subsequent years. You're not pulling Prior, Wood or Z from the rotation. You shouldn't pull Williams, because he's one of the guys you want to evaluate for next year. Rusch doesn't have to start, but what about Mitre? How are we going to know if he might find enough consistency to be a good starting pitcher in the majors if he keeps pitching out of the bullpen? Not only does keeping Maddux in the rotation hurt the Cubs from a financial standpoint next year, but it also hurts in terms of player evaluation. Also, the argument that no free agent would consider the Cubs if they did this is completely absurd. 95 percent of MLB players have proven time and time again that they will go where the money is. If the Cubs have money and give a player his best offer, chances are very good he'll be a Cub - no matter what happens to Greg Maddux.