Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    Oh No: Cade Horton Leaves in 2nd Inning of Cubs Game Against Guardians

    Arguably, the best reason to believe the 2026 Cubs can overcome the Milwaukee Brewers to win the NL Central—and, indeed, to make a deep run in October—is the presence of Cade Horton at the top of their rotation. On Friday, Horton felt something and left his start abruptly. Yikes.

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of © Ken Blaze-Imagn Images

    Cubs Video

    The Cubs amassed pretty good starting rotation depth this winter, all things considered. They entered the season with a fully healthy group of five: Matthew Boyd, Cade Horton, Shota Imanaga, Edward Cabreras and Jameson Taillon. Behind them, as depth, the team has Colin Rea and Ben Brown in the big-league bullpen and Javier Assad waiting in the Triple-A Iowa rotation. You can't be much better-positioned to withstand an injury than that, in the modern game, especially given that the team will get Justin Steele back after his 2025 Tommy John surgery, sometime this summer.

    Take the best arm out of any pitching staff, though, and it looks a lot weaker, immediately. That might be what the Cubs are facing now. On Friday, Cade Horton departed in the middle of an at-bat in the bottom of the second inning, feeling obvious discomfort and calling the trainer to the mound before leaving. His fastball velocity nosed down sharply immediately before he left, too.

    We'll update when we know more about what's happening, but it's not too early to harbor deep concerns here. Should Horton miss significant time, the Cubs would be without their ace and the rest of the rotation would immediately seem stretched and strained—just as they were around this time last year, when they lost Steele.

    UPDATE: If you were hoping the issue was a simple blister or that Horton was dealing with a lingering cold or flu, you'll have to let that hope go. The issue is in his forearm, the team announced.

     

    Now, the question is of severity. A trip to the injured list is virtually guaranteed, any time a pitcher leaves a game with a forearm problem. Presumably, Horton will be sent for imaging, and much of the Cubs' upside for this season will hinge on the outcome thereof.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos

    Cubs Top Prospects

    Juan Cabada

    DSL Cubs - Rookie, SS
    Two days after turning 18, Cabada made his State-side debut. Batting third and playing second base, he went 3-for-5 with a triple and three RBI.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Outshined_One

    Posted

    7 minutes ago, CubinNY said:

    My opinion (obviously) is that they should let Assad and Rae pitch until they demonstrate they can't do the job. There is no sense in making a panic move or signing scrap heap guys. I'd like to give Brown a shot too, but he needs to throw more strikes. Unless he develops a better third pitch he can use with higher regularity, he isn't a starter. 

    This is pretty much where I'm at with the rotation.  Assad and Rea are unlikely to give you top tier performances every time out, but they're better than anything you'd pick up off the scrap heap and they are the best options you'll find in the system at the moment.  I'd rather not see them finish the season in the rotation, but having Rea pick up a few starts while Boyd rehabs and having Assad go until Steele (or Wiggins) is ready should be good enough for this team to tread water for the next month or two.

    squally1313

    Posted

    4 minutes ago, CubinNY said:

    My opinion (obviously) is that they should let Assad and Rae pitch until they demonstrate they can't do the job. There is no sense in making a panic move or signing scrap heap guys. I'd like to give Brown a shot too, but he needs to throw more strikes. Unless he develops a better third pitch he can use with higher regularity, he isn't a starter. 

    Generally agreed. In terms of Brown, the overall, still small sample size numbers have been fine. 10.2 innings, 9.3 K/9, 3.4 BB/9, getting better luck on HR/FB (9.1% v 15.5% last year) and BABIP (.259 v .347). 4.22 ERA, 3.46 FIP. You give Assad and Rea the edge on 'pitchability' or the less metric skills, you give Brown the edge on pure stuff, I'd say at this point, they're all about equal. Brown is also bringing a third pitch into the mix this year. In 2025 he was 56% 4 seam, 40% curveball. So far this year he's at 44% 4 seam, 36% curve, 16% sinker. 

    He probably deserves a shot at the starter spot at some point, if only just for attrition at the top. But think he's needed in the role he's currently in and it would be a pretty significant drop off to stretch him out in AAA and have to either make do with a bunch of short relievers behind 5 starters that aren't going deep, or go to like...Cam Sanders or Vince Velasquez. Any set back from Boyd or Steele and you need to start coming up with another plan here, but in the short term it's....fine. 

    Bertz

    Posted

    I like Brown where he is for right now too.  IMO his primary issue is between the ears.  I think he's gotten snakebitten with BABIP enough times that when he faces some adversity he turns into the CJ "ah horsefeathers here we go again" guy.  We saw it on Sunday where a cheap double and a walk and things started spinning too fast for him.

    I'd probably try and keep him in the role he's in for another ~month, then I'd keep him in long relief but try and push him into higher leverage (come into messy innings, close out a 1 run lead in the 7th, etc.) and then look to move him back towards the rotation.

    Bull

    Posted

    We need to fix this. It is spreading.

     

    its spelled Rea. Colin Rea.

    squally1313

    Posted

    4 minutes ago, Bull said:

    We need to fix this. It is spreading.

     

    its spelled Rea. Colin Rea.

    Are you sure? I'm almost positive that there's an 'h' at the end of it.

    • Like 1
    imb

    Posted

    it's actually spelled caroline anyway

    • Haha 2
    Tryptamine

    Posted

    On 4/9/2026 at 8:25 AM, Jason Ross said:

    Giolito looks pretty cooked. Ignore the ERA for a moment from last year:
    - K% was down from 25% to 19%
    - o-contact% up 10%
    - 3% swinging strike down
    - contact% up 5%
    - Stuff+ down to 92 from 97

    To recap: hitters swung less (because they're hunting pitches), made more contact when they did swing, made more contact on chase pitches, stopped striking out, and his pitch shape really sucked. Not good.

    There's a reason he's a free agent in April. If he wants a full-on MiLB deal with some sort of an opt-out by May-15th to show he's got something in Iowa? Sure. But beyond that, there shouldn't be any rush to offer him a spot. Rea and Assad are probably just as good, Wiggins is probably not *too* far away, and Connor Noland is probably fine for a spot start or Ben Brown if you need them. With how much time it'll take for Gio to ramp up (say, 3-4 weeks) i's probably not far off from when Boyd would be around coming back.

    Apparently Giolito wants 2 years which I am 100% out on and the rumored ask has been 15M annually which is way too much.

    Stratos

    Posted

    Giolito sucks and isn't an upgrade.

    Tangled Up in Plaid

    Posted

    giolito's agent is out of his mind if he thinks anyone is gonna give him more than a minor league deal at this point

    Bertz

    Posted

    There is no good news on this front only degrees of bad (insert Curb "Good Hodgkins' joke), but this is one of the better possible outcomes here:

     

     

    • Like 1
    UMFan83

    Posted

    13 minutes ago, Bertz said:

    There is no good news on this front only degrees of bad (insert Curb "Good Hodgkins' joke), but this is one of the better possible outcomes here:

     

     

    See you next August or September Cade (hopefully)

    Tangled Up in Plaid

    Posted

    50 minutes ago, Bertz said:

    There is no good news on this front only degrees of bad (insert Curb "Good Hodgkins' joke), but this is one of the better possible outcomes here:

     

     

    still got hit with the bullet but at least we dodged the nuke

    Irrelevant Dude

    Posted

    15-16 months is a little long for a revision repair, no?

    KCCub

    Posted

    11 minutes ago, Irrelevant Dude said:

    15-16 months is a little long for a revision repair, no?

    That’s what I was thinking. I’m slightly confused on the verbiage I’m seeing reported. The report above is the most detailed and sounds like it came directly from CC. Taylor reported “full TJ”, so I originally thought it wasn’t the brace surgery.

     

    Tangled Up in Plaid

    Posted

    Just now, KCCub said:

    That’s what I was thinking. I’m slightly confused on the verbiage I’m seeing reported. The report above is the most detailed and sounds like it came directly from CC. Taylor reported “full TJ”, so I originally thought it wasn’t the brace surgery.

     

    I think T-Mac is wrong here. 15-16 months is the same time table Steele had.

    • Like 1
    Stratos

    Posted

    2 hours ago, Tangled Up in Plaid said:

    I think T-Mac is wrong here. 15-16 months is the same time table Steele had.

    Weird.  On the broadcast today Taylor said the same as. Her tweet, that Horton had surgery yesterday and when they went inside the elbow they decided to do the full TJS in his UCL.  Out 15-16 months.  

    Tangled Up in Plaid

    Posted

    21 minutes ago, Stratos said:

    Weird.  On the broadcast today Taylor said the same as. Her tweet, that Horton had surgery yesterday and when they went inside the elbow they decided to do the full TJS in his UCL.  Out 15-16 months.  

    this directly contradicts Craig who said revision with a brace. Not sure what the deal is

    Irrelevant Dude

    Posted

    Also, I would be somewhat surprised with the revision procedure in someone Horton's age, as my understanding is that it may not have the same longetivy as a full on ligament replacement.  For a pitcher in their late twenties or early thirties, it makes sense, but Horton could still have a 10+ year career ahead of him.

    Tangled Up in Plaid

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, Irrelevant Dude said:

    Also, I would be somewhat surprised with the revision procedure in someone Horton's age, as my understanding is that it may not have the same longetivy as a full on ligament replacement.

    he already had the full Tommy John in college so I'm guessing that's why

    chibears55

    Posted

    So, he'll either be pitching a major league game in August of 2027 or April 2028.

    Even if he's able to pitch in August,  I wouldn't rush him back into the rotation,  id give him 2-3 starts and shut him down,  if he responds ok to that,  then he can have a normal offseason and get him ready for 2028.

     

    BKHoo

    Posted

    Right - just let him see a taste of baseball again in late 27.  
     

    It’s basically a 2028 return. Ouch. 

    gflore34

    Posted (edited)

    I think it best to forget about Cade Horton altogether, with the surgery, chances of re-injury.  He should be removed from the equation of the Cubs future.  Which, of course, is unfortunate and really sucks, it's the price teams pay for velocity.  He'll more likely end up as one of those guys who never pitches again because he can't keep of the injured list.  Than someone who makes it all the way back.

    Edited by gflore34
    • Like 1
    Rcal10

    Posted

    16 minutes ago, gflore34 said:

    I think it best to forget about Cade Horton altogether, with the surgery, chances of re-injury.  He should be removed from the equation of the Cubs future.  Which, of course, is unfortunate and really sucks, it's the price teams pay for velocity.  He'll more likely end up as one of those guys who never pitches again because he can't keep of the injured list.  Than someone who make it's all the way back.

    I don’t this this is true, at all. Sure, we have to wait and it sucks. And it is possible he doesn’t make it back. But, I think it is more likely he does come back and pitch several years in the majors. Maybe have to temper his projections because of injuries affecting him. But he still has, IMO, a better chance of pitching again in the majors then never pitching again. 

    gflore34

    Posted

    10 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

    I don’t this this is true, at all. Sure, we have to wait and it sucks. And it is possible he doesn’t make it back. But, I think it is more likely he does come back and pitch several years in the majors. Maybe have to temper his projections because of injuries affecting him. But he still has, IMO, a better chance of pitching again in the majors then never pitching again. 

    I hope you're right.

    Tryptamine

    Posted

     So, Cade underwent surgery not to far off the time line of Steele and they both supposedly had the brace, so why is Steele expected back toward the end of May of the following year while Horton isn't even a sure thing to appear at all in the following year?




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...