Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    NEWS: Jed Hoyer Agrees to Extension with Cubs

    In a fairly shocking turn of events, the Chicago Cubs have signed president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer to a multi-year contract extenion, days before the 2025 MLB trade deadline. No longer is Hoyer a potential lame duck; the ramifications could be enormous.

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of © Kamil Krzaczynski-Imagn Images

    Cubs Video

    The Chicago Cubs and president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer agreed to a multi-year contract extension Monday, according to multiple reports. It's a seismic moment, as much because of the timing as based on the news itself. Hoyer is working hard to upgrade the Cubs roster he built in the shadow of this Thursday's MLB trade deadline, and this news changes the context of his pursuits.

    Sahadev Sharma of The Athletic broke the news on Twitter.

    Last fall, much was made of the fact that Hoyer would be out of contract at the end of the 2025 campaign. For most fans (and even many throughout the ranks of other front offices and the baseball industry, writ large), Hoyer's status has been viewed as a microcosm of that of the team in general. Given the tenor of his own comments about his lack of an extension heading into last offseason—and given the aggressive offseason he then orchestrated—the assumption had been that the ownership group would move on from Hoyer if the team didn't make the playoffs this year.

    Now, apparently based on the fact that the team is in good position to do that (but without any guarantee that they actually will, in a competitive National League and an NL Central race that is currently tied), the team has jumped the gun on that decision. Presumably, this alleviates some pressure on Hoyer to make trades that might not have been in the best long-term interests of the team, and encourages him to focus on winning both now and in the future. For many, though, it will also read as an early declaration of a victory not yet won—and a questionable demonstration of faith in an executive whose track record as the top decision-maker on the baseball side of the organization is somewhat uneven.

    Under Hoyer, the Cubs have unloaded the remnants of their 2016 World Series-winning core. In their 2021 fire sale, they did acquire some very valuable pieces, including not only Pete Crow-Armstrong, but Kevin Alcántara and Daniel Palencia. They've signed several free agents to deals that panned out well, and under new scouting director Dan Kantrovitz, they've enjoyed more success in the MLB Draft. Their reputation in that area is improving. Hoyer made perspicacious trades to land Michael Busch and Kyle Tucker over the last two offseasons and has succeeded with forays into the Japanese market with the signings of Seiya Suzuki and Shota Imanaga. He also landed the biggest managerial free agent in baseball history when he signed Craig Counsell away from the Brewers in November 2023.

    On the other hand, struggling often to manage upward and somewhat stubborn in his evaluations of players, Hoyer has allowed himself to be unduly limited by the budgets set by the Ricketts family. At their whims, he non-tendered Kyle Schwarber, and has failed to land the elite free agents who might have put either of the last two iterations of this team over the top. His signature is a certain baseline conservatism that does not always serve the club well.

    The thinking in striking this deal now must trace in part to Hoyer's conversations with rival executives about trades that would ship out some of the key players who make up the farm system he tried to strengthen over the last few years. Not only are his incentives and the team's no longer misaligned, but he can now avoid having any negotiating partner try to use his own contract status as leverage against him. If Hoyer (as, based on his personality, we might well imagine he would) would feel unduly guilty about trading a haul of prospects for a high-impact, short-term piece, that internal conflict is now resolved, too.

    Chicago's pitching development has improved under Hoyer's stewardship. So has their farm system. Yet, they haven't won anything of note under his leadership, and his mistakes in roster building have been major factors in that failure. Ownership has liked his way of doing things enough to decide to re-up with him. Now, based on what he does over the next few days and what his team does over the next few months, fans will get to render their own judgments about that choice.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    JHBulls

    Posted

    Good, good! 

    Now let’s make some trades, Jed. 

    Rcal10

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Irrelevant Dude said:

    I'm probably reading more into this than what is actually there... but is it possible the Cubs announced this now to give Jed a bit more leverage going into the next 3 days of trade negotiations?

    I think it is absolutely easier for him to maneuver now. I said that when it was suggested he would sign an extension at the ASB. Trades will be easier and so will negotiations with Tucker and PCA. They know the guy is here for a bit. I know Jed gets cut down by fans that honestly are pretty unfair about where they place blame. People suggesting he has more assets don’t want to hear that Ricketts doesn’t allow him to use the assets the large market teams should use. They just want to bitch about Jed. Sure, he makes mistakes. But he does way more right than wrong. And complaining he hasn’t made the playoffs since he got here is not seeing what he had to do when he started, and what TR allows him to do. The Cubs were not going to get anyone better, who would go along with Ricketts plans. I am glad they signed him. 

    cubfansince77

    Posted

    Some really good posts in this thread and since joining this board I've kinda seen the light with regard to Jed and the job he's done. He's been solid overall and the biggest complaint I have (Schwarber all day long) really wasn't his call from everything I can tell. Seriously doubt he wanted to break up the '16 core but decisions that big weren't his to make quite obviously. 

    I guess TR had a come to Jesus moment and decided to sign him before the deadline to free Jed up in terms of potential deal making. Certainly won't hurt his leverage and hopefully will help it. Now get it done man: 1 starter, 1 reliever and 1 good bench option. 

    • Like 1
    Rcal10

    Posted

    20 minutes ago, cubfansince77 said:

    Some really good posts in this thread and since joining this board I've kinda seen the light with regard to Jed and the job he's done. He's been solid overall and the biggest complaint I have (Schwarber all day long) really wasn't his call from everything I can tell. Seriously doubt he wanted to break up the '16 core but decisions that big weren't his to make quite obviously. 

    I guess TR had a come to Jesus moment and decided to sign him before the deadline to free Jed up in terms of potential deal making. Certainly won't hurt his leverage and hopefully will help it. Now get it done man: 1 starter, 1 reliever and 1 good bench option. 

    Or two starting pitchers and the one get better because Horton moves to the pen.🤷

    Jfoley89

    Posted

    I'm rather meh overall.  Jed's FO hasn't received a single top 10 vote by baseball executives in the last 2 years according to executives, and is one of only 8 teams to receive no votes.  That being said, he's fine enough.  It was pretty disappointing this was the deadline news, but it fits the general Cubs vibe of the last few years.  We didn't spend money on the team or players, but we got a great manager and invested off the field. 

    Venting aside, he doesn't horribly mismanage the team and he's had some wins building this team.  He seems to struggle with internal scouting and valuing our own guys, but Busch and Tucker have been great for the Cubs. 

    sweetpeteman

    Posted

    This is a good move that solidifies the during office, allowing them to make the necessary moves to better the team. 

     

    Or

    This is a crap move that locks the a Cubs to a mediocre front office. Tucker will walk this year and the Cubs will go back to 83 wins a year.

     

    I reserve the right to delete the wrong take.

    Wilson A2000

    Posted

    16 minutes ago, Jfoley89 said:

    I'm rather meh overall.  Jed's FO hasn't received a single top 10 vote by baseball executives in the last 2 years according to executives, and is one of only 8 teams to receive no votes.  That being said, he's fine enough.  It was pretty disappointing this was the deadline news, but it fits the general Cubs vibe of the last few years.  We didn't spend money on the team or players, but we got a great manager and invested off the field. 

    Venting aside, he doesn't horribly mismanage the team and he's had some wins building this team.  He seems to struggle with internal scouting and valuing our own guys, but Busch and Tucker have been great for the Cubs. 

    If Jed is above average to good, why do his fellow GMs think he is bottom of the barrel? 

    • Like 1
    Irrelevant Dude

    Posted

    Just now, Wilson A2000 said:

    If Jed is above average to good, why do his fellow GMs think he is bottom of the barrel? 

    Are GM's really ranking other GM's?

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    Just now, Wilson A2000 said:

    If Jed is above average to good, why do his fellow GMs think he is bottom of the barrel? 

    Many of the best baseball writers cannot get the HoF correct literally year over year. 

    I'm not super worried about how the rest of the front office community feels. Superlatives are cool talking points, but I sincerely hope no MLB organization is using them as a barometer. 

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    Just now, Irrelevant Dude said:

    Are GM's really ranking other GM's?

    There was an anonymous vote that the Athletic published the last few years.

    Ding Dong Johnson

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Irrelevant Dude said:

    Are GM's really ranking other GM's?

    Yes

    chibears55

    Posted

    2 hours ago, Irrelevant Dude said:

    I'm probably reading more into this than what is actually there... but is it possible the Cubs announced this now to give Jed a bit more leverage going into the next 3 days of trade negotiations?

    This is good to show stability in the organization now.

    This also could be a precursor to getting an extension done with Tucker and possibly PCA but mainly Tucker now, and getting him signed now could allow Jed to move outfield prospects in trades.

    Who knows maybe Tucker said he wouldn't negotiate with them without having stability in the FO first, now they do. 🤷‍♂️

    Derwood

    Posted

    If Theo was making the moves when Hoyer was the GM, and Hoyer is making the moves when Hawkins is the GM, then what exactly does a Cubs' GM do?

    • Like 1
    Irrelevant Dude

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, Derwood said:

    If Theo was making the moves when Hoyer was the GM, and Hoyer is making the moves when Hawkins is the GM, then what exactly does a Cubs' GM do?

    I'm guessing a lot of legwork.  "I'll pass you off to my assistant now to finalize the details."

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    22 minutes ago, Derwood said:

    If Theo was making the moves when Hoyer was the GM, and Hoyer is making the moves when Hawkins is the GM, then what exactly does a Cubs' GM do?

    Teams have reshuffled the titles that people hold to help hire people from other orgs. Teams won't let FO personnel interview for lateral positions, but have to allow a step up, so teams started to move the powers that we traditionally associate with "General Manager" to "Vice President of Baseball Operations" a position "above" that of the GM. The same is true for "General Manager" and "Assistant General Manager". Carter Hawkins was not the General Manager in Cleveland, but was an assistant GM. By offering him a "promotion" the Cubs were able to bypass any block the Guardians might have by offering him a lateral move. 

    So look at it as being another strong voice in the room, bringing ideas, being a sounding board, doing their own analysis, etc. They're just second in command, the titles are different, but the structure is essentially the same.

    Bertz

    Posted (edited)

    13 hours ago, Wilson A2000 said:

    If Jed is above average to good, why do his fellow GMs think he is bottom of the barrel? 

    I don't think "not top 10" is anywhere close to "bottom of the barrel"?

    Edited by Bertz
    Whoops
    Rcal10

    Posted (edited)

    Looks like if anything happens it will happen on Thursday. The issue I have with this is with the Cubs supposedly eyeing controlled pitchers, there really isn’t a reason whoever they are talking to needs to come down on their ask. If they don’t get it they can just keep the pitcher. A rental is different. Trade him or lose him next year. More urgency to move that guy. I am beginning to think Cubs end up with one pitcher who is a MOR starter and hopefully a bench bat. Maybe something like Kelly and Urias. Which doesn’t move the needle much for me. Maybe also a middle relief pitcher or Iglesias. 

    Edited by Rcal10
    SparkMark1

    Posted

    So the DO know how to do contract extensions!

    gflore34

    Posted

    18 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

    Looks like if anything happens it will happen on Thursday. The issue I have with this is with the Cubs supposedly eyeing controlled pitchers, there really isn’t a reason whoever they are talking to needs to come down on their ask. If they don’t get it they can just keep the pitcher. A rental is different. Trade him or lose him next year. More urgency to move that guy. I am beginning to think Cubs end up with one pitcher who is a MOR starter and hopefully a bench bat. Maybe something like Kelly and Ortiz. Which doesn’t move the needle much for me. Maybe also a middle relief pitcher or Iglesias. 

    Was thinking along the same lines, why not go rentals?  Kelly, Soroka, Castro will not cost any of the top prospects and improve the Cubs chances, seems like a win-win to me.

    Brian707

    Posted

    14 hours ago, Derwood said:

    If Theo was making the moves when Hoyer was the GM, and Hoyer is making the moves when Hawkins is the GM, then what exactly does a Cubs' GM do?

    george costanza work GIF

    Rcal10

    Posted

    30 minutes ago, gflore34 said:

    Was thinking along the same lines, why not go rentals?  Kelly, Soroka, Castro will not cost any of the top prospects and improve the Cubs chances, seems like a win-win to me.

    To be clear, I wouldn’t be happy with one rental pitcher and Urias. Now if they did add Iglesias and instead of Urias it was Castro, it is ok. But even then, I would hope for a second pitcher. Kelly, Soroka, Castro and Iglesias would be a fine deadline upgrade. All rentals. But with other teams wanting people too, they still might cost more than we think. 

    squally1313

    Posted

    30 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

    To be clear, I wouldn’t be happy with one rental pitcher and Urias. Now if they did add Iglesias and instead of Urias it was Castro, it is ok. But even then, I would hope for a second pitcher. Kelly, Soroka, Castro and Iglesias would be a fine deadline upgrade. All rentals. But with other teams wanting people too, they still might cost more than we think. 

    To clarify, which Urias are we talking about here?

    chibears55

    Posted

    59 minutes ago, Brian707 said:

    george costanza work GIF

    The paperwork and tough interviews 🤷‍♂️🤣

    chibears55

    Posted

    15 hours ago, Derwood said:

    If Theo was making the moves when Hoyer was the GM, and Hoyer is making the moves when Hawkins is the GM, then what exactly does a Cubs' GM do?

    Paperwork and tough interviews 🤷‍♂️😅




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...