Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    BREAKING: Cubs Sign Third Baseman Alex Bregman to Five-Year Deal

    The Cubs got their man this time. With the largest annual average value in team history and the long-term, no-opt-out structure they craved last winter, they’ve signed Alex Bregman.

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of © Brian Fluharty-Imagn Imagesan F

    Cubs Video

    The Chicago Cubs and third baseman Alex Bregman have agreed to a five year, $175-million deal, sources confirmed to North Side Baseball. 

    Bregman, who will turn 32 in March, gets the largest AAV in Cubs history, at $35 million. The deal spares the team from having to spread money out into Bregman's late 30s and early 40s, though it almost guarantees that they will surpass the competitive-balance tax threshold for 2026—and perhaps years to come.
     
    In exchange for that, the Cubs get a player who fits their offensive philosophy perfectly. Bregman makes exceptionally good swing decisions and has run superb contact rates almost throughout his career. He lacks high-end bat speed, but creates power by excelling at pulling the ball in the air. He also plays a sturdy third base, and his arrival carries interesting implications for Matt Shaw and Nico Hoerner.
     
    Things were very different for Bregman this year, untethered from the qualifying offer but one year older and with a platform season in which he hit brilliantly early, got hurt, then struggled at times in the second half. Instead of being open to flexible structures and locking in on deals that offered him quick paths back to free agency, Bregman and agent Scott Boras sought a lucrative long-term deal. The Red Sox, who wooed Bregman with a deferral structure and multiple opt-outs last winter, were willing to go longer than the Cubs in terms of years, but refused to pay the high AAV the Cubs offered.
     
    Once he landed Edward Cabrera in a trade earlier this week, Hoyer got permission from ownership to exceed the CBT threshold in order to sign either Bregman or Bo Bichette, a source familiar with the team's plans said. That allowed Chicago to scale up its offer to Bregman, and helped them land the player they hoped would be the capstone to their offseason last year.
     
    In 10 big-league seasons, Bregman has had an on-base percentage under .350 just twice: in 2016 and in 2024. After being in the Astros organization for nearly a decade, he signed with the Red Sox in February and batted .273/.360/.462 in 495 plate appearances. That marked his highest slugging average since 2019, and with the deep well at Wrigley Field replacing the Green Monster in left field for his home games this year, don't expect him to slug as much for the Cubs. However, he adds a much-needed right-handed threat to their lineup, and will spend lots of time hitting between Michael Busch and Ian Happ or Moisés Ballesteros, giving the Cubs terrific lineup depth and balance.
     
    With Bregman locked up (and locked in, with a full no-trade clause, a source said), the team's infield is in for a shakeup. Dansby Swanson will be the shortstop for at least another year or two, but Matt Shaw has been displaced from the lineup. That could be a temporary change, with Nico Hoerner a free agent after 2026, but it could also prove to be permanent. Bregman is likely to stay at third base. Shaw could slide to second if Hoerner is traded, but the team could also plan to rotate him in as a backup at both second and third (with Hoerner sometimes spelling Swanson at shortstop) and/or to use Bregman as the designated hitter on a semi-regular basis, especially against left-handed pitchers.
     
    The ramifications of the deal will spread out and become clearer in the weeks ahead. For now, what we can say for sure is that the Cubs are serious about challenging the Brewers in the NL Central—and in 2026, they might just overtake them.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    CubinNY

    Posted

    I really wanted to like Shaw the person when he was drafted. He said all the right things. But he is a douchebag's douchebag. Be that as it may, he's a useful baseball player who will likely get better. The Cubs have a perfect "waves" scenario with him and Nico. There is no reason to trade him or Nico. Let the season play out, give him reps, and see what happens. If they find they need someone at the deadline, he or Nico could be traded. But it would be foolish to trade either one right now. 

    As long as nobody else he idolizes who is also a neo-Nazi gets shot, we will be good. 

    • Like 2
    • Disagree 1
    Radar3454

    Posted

    I'm a liberal, but his batting stance out of spring training bothered me more than going to a memorial service that turned into a political rally that he was invited to by the widow. Pretty sure most mlb players have very different political and moral values than I do. 

    • Like 2
    Bertz

    Posted

    This is surprisingly mortal, especially when you account for the fact that FG's depth chart tend to be very generous with pitcher playing time.

    Andrew Friedman has mentioned getting younger this offseason, I'm curious if that means taking a step back this year and keeping lanes open for prospects to fill in before this turns into a late era Dombrowski roster, or if it the pedal stays firmly on the metal and they simply add a young FA like Bichette.

    ToolDRT

    Posted

    7 hours ago, Andy said:

    Top right corner of the page there are three horizontal lines, click that, then click 'account' which will bring up a sub-menu from which you can click 'ignored users,' then type in the username you wish to ignore

    Thank you, sir! 

    Rcal10

    Posted

    54 minutes ago, ToolDRT said:

    Thank you, sir! 

    I had to do the same thing a few weeks back with someone. I still have him ignored, but I am not sure he posts any longer. Pretty sure Banks will go away any day now. Might even be gone. 

    jersey cubs fan

    Posted

    6 hours ago, Radar3454 said:

    I'm a liberal, but his batting stance out of spring training bothered me more than going to a memorial service that turned into a political rally that he was invited to by the widow. Pretty sure most mlb players have very different political and moral values than I do. 

    It didn’t turn into a political rally. It explicitly was one from the start. 

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
    Brian707

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, jersey cubs fan said:

    It didn’t turn into a political rally. It explicitly was one from the start. 

    The grift doesn't die when the grifter dies

    • Like 1
    Dfan25

    Posted

    Bregman’s expected to become oficial tomorrow , with a press conference on Thursday ( Nightendale ) 

    • Like 1
    chibears55

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Rcal10 said:

    I had to do the same thing a few weeks back with someone. I still have him ignored, but I am not sure he posts any longer. Pretty sure Banks will go away any day now. Might even be gone. 

    He's gone, everything he posted says guest now.

    Stratos

    Posted

    9 hours ago, Post Count Padder said:

    I don't know if it was mentioned here yet but Fangraphs did a write-up of the Bregman deal and included a shout out to NSBB and Matt Trueblood.

     

    https://blogs.fangraphs.com/cubs-land-alex-bregman-on-five-year-deal/

    Here's what they say about the Cubs rotation:

    Quote

    Even with Cabrera and the eventual return of Justin Steele, our depth charts have the Cubs’ starting pitching projected for just 11.2 WAR, which ranks just 19th even though it would be an improvement of nearly a full win over the 10.3 mark they put up in 2025.

     

    Geographyhater8888

    Posted (edited)

    10 hours ago, Stratos said:

    Here's what they say about the Cubs rotation:

     

    That’s with steamer projecting Horton to post a 1.2, a full win less than last season. Ben Brown posted a 1.1 fWAR last season. So if he’s worth 1 less win then that means injuries, because you can’t convince me Ben Brown was worth over a win in 15 starts last year because of his respectable FIP. He flat out sucked.

    I know they’re conservative with their projections but what we hope will be a full season of Horton vs 15 starts from Brown won’t be close a wash like their model says. The rotation will be more more than a win better unless they’re devistated by injuries.
     

    Edited by Geographyhater8888
    • Like 2



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...