Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
The Indians clearly weren't a better team by the end of the year. They lost 6 of their last 7, choking their way out of the playoffs, and the White Sox won the World Series. The White Sox are a better team, and hardly anything has changed to make that not true.

 

Why is the relative ability of the two teams defined as what happend in the last 7 games of the year. The Indians were better over the last 81, why not use that definition? They were 4 games better than the Sox in the 2nd half, and made up 8 games in pythagorean standings which are supposed to measure a team's true ability. The Indians will finish ahead of the White Sox next year barring injury problems.

You forget how easy the Indians schedule was over the last month and a half. They beat up on the Rays/Royals/Tigers for a long time.

 

The Sox played the Tigers 3 more times and the Royals 1 less. The Sox weren't exactly playing juggernauts themselves.

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...