Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

1. Sexson 143 in 465 AB's

2. Dunn 135 in 450 AB's

3. Wilkerson 131 in 472 AB's

4. Burrell 129 in 464 AB's

5. Glaus 125 in 462 AB's

7. Bay 118 in 498 AB's

7. Edmonds 118 in 397 AB's

9. Inge 117 in 511 AB's

10. Chavez 113 in 524 AB's

11. Jenkins 112 in 450 AB's

12. A Rodriguez 111 in 501 AB's

13. Bellhorn 110 in 289 AB's

13. Sizemore 110 in 526 AB's

15. Blalock 109 in 553 AB's

16. Cabrera 108 in 516 AB's

16. Teixeira 108 in 544 AB's

18. Abreu 107 in 497 AB's

18. Ensberg 107 in 469 AB's

20. Delgado 106 in 430 AB's

20. Peralta 106 in 405 AB's

 

29. Patterson 100 in 379 AB's

 

Strikeout percentages (not in order, from the top 20)

 

1. Sexson 30.7%

2. Dunn 30%

3. Wilkerson 27.7%

4. Burrell 27.8%

5. Glaus 27%

7. Bay 23.6%

7. Edmonds 29.7%

9. Inge 22.8%

10. Chavez 21.5%

11. Jenkins 24.8%

12. A Rodriguez 22.1%

13. Bellhorn 38%

13. Sizemore 20.9%

15. Blalock 19.7

16. Cabrera 20.9%

16. Teixeira 19.8%

18. Abreu 21.5%

18. Ensberg 22.8%

20. Delgado 24.6%

20. Peralta 26.1%

 

29. Patterson 26.3%

Recommended Posts

Posted

Top 10 percentage SO leaders out of the top 20 total SO guys plus Patterson (in order)

 

1. Bellhorn 38%

2. Sexson 30.7%

3. Dunn 30%

4. Edmonds 29.7%

5. Burrell 27.8%

6. Wilkerson 27.7%

7. Glaus 27%

8. Patterson 26.3%

9. Peralta 26.1%

10. Jenkins 24.8%

Posted
No, K's alone don't make you a bad player. But combine that with no walks, few hits, and then you have a problem.

 

so what about a guy with no k's, no walks, and few hits? is he not as bad a problem?

Posted
No, K's alone don't make you a bad player. But combine that with no walks, few hits, and then you have a problem.

 

so what about a guy with no k's, no walks, and few hits? is he not as bad a problem?

 

No, then you have a guy like Neifi, who also happens to be a big problem.

 

But with CPatt, K's are a part of his problem. I get it. It's about OBP, Slugging, etc. But CPatt with his ridiculous K/BB ratio just shows me he has poor hand-eye coordination.

Posted
No, K's alone don't make you a bad player. But combine that with no walks, few hits, and then you have a problem.

 

so what about a guy with no k's, no walks, and few hits? is he not as bad a problem?

 

No, then you have a guy like Neifi, who also happens to be a big problem.

 

But with CPatt, K's are a part of his problem. I get it. It's about OBP, Slugging, etc. But CPatt with his ridiculous K/BB ratio just shows me he has poor hand-eye coordination.

 

His hand eye coordination is fine, its that little thing in between the two (his brain) that is whats wrong. His ridiculous K/BB ratio is a function of his horrible pitch recognition, which at this point doesnt appear fixable.

Posted
One thing I noticed, all of those guys suck. Especially that Dunn and Rodriguez guy.

 

Striking out is a sin, and this list proves it.

Morgan Ensberg doesn't suck.

Posted
No, K's alone don't make you a bad player. But combine that with no walks, few hits, and then you have a problem.

 

so what about a guy with no k's, no walks, and few hits? is he not as bad a problem?

If he puts the ball in play w/ runners on and has gold glove caliber defense, then no, that's not a bad problem.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...