NFL firing season is here

[Derwood]

6 of the 7 longest tenured coaches have Super Bowl rings. The other hasn’t won a playoff game (and just got extended)

[Banedon]

[Cubswin11]

Can’t wait to see what this guys idea of “splashy” is.

 

http://cdn.barstoolsports.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/13/Screen-Shot-2017-01-13-at-4.07.44-PM.png

[WrigleyField 22]

Supposedly 100m 10 year. Maybe no ownership stake then?

[Cubswin11]

Supposedly 100m 10 year. Maybe no ownership stake then?

I saw all owners would’ve needed to unanimously vote on the ownership thing to allow it. Guessing someone would’ve voted no as to not set a precedent for future HC hirings.

 

 

Also the NFL, where owners can commit $100 million to former Hooters Spokesmen to be their head coach but can’t afford to build their new stadiums....

Edited January 5, 2018 by Cubswin11

[jersey cubs fan]

Supposedly 100m 10 year. Maybe no ownership stake then?

Pretty sure gruden was quoted yesterday saying no ownership

[jersey cubs fan]

Supposedly 100m 10 year. Maybe no ownership stake then?

I saw all owners would’ve needed to unanimously vote on the ownership thing to allow it. Guessing someone would’ve voted no as to not set a precedent for future HC hirings.

 

 

Also the NFL, where owners can commit $100 million to former Hooters Spokesmen to be their head coach but can afford to build their new stadiums....

the owners would have to approve, but they also know the increased salary changes the market for coaches. So it's not like they'd all dismiss it out of hand.

[Cubswin11]

Supposedly 100m 10 year. Maybe no ownership stake then?

I saw all owners would’ve needed to unanimously vote on the ownership thing to allow it. Guessing someone would’ve voted no as to not set a precedent for future HC hirings.

 

 

Also the NFL, where owners can commit $100 million to former Hooters Spokesmen to be their head coach but can afford to build their new stadiums....

the owners would have to approve, but they also know the increased salary changes the market for coaches. So it's not like they'd all dismiss it out of hand.

I think it would be a pretty clear dismissal right away. The salary may change the market a little but I think it will mostly be considered an outlier as it’s a stupid move and more than just a regular hiring, it’s a marketing/PR move for a team re-locating just as much. I think almost every owner would rather have coaches salaries go up 10-25% than start having ownership stakes be on the table for future negotiations.

[WrigleyField 22]

I saw all owners would’ve needed to unanimously vote on the ownership thing to allow it. Guessing someone would’ve voted no as to not set a precedent for future HC hirings.

 

 

Also the NFL, where owners can commit $100 million to former Hooters Spokesmen to be their head coach but can afford to build their new stadiums....

the owners would have to approve, but they also know the increased salary changes the market for coaches. So it's not like they'd all dismiss it out of hand.

I think it would be a pretty clear dismissal right away. The salary may change the market a little but I think it will mostly be considered an outlier as it’s a stupid move and more than just a regular hiring, it’s a marketing/PR move for a team re-locating just as much. I think almost every owner would rather have coaches salaries go up 10-25% than start having ownership stakes be on the table for future negotiations.

The AAV isn't as much of an outlier as just the years and total I think. Carroll and Payton were at 8 already and Belicheck and Reid at 7.5. Handful of others at 6-7. Who has gotten a deal past 5 years in recent memory though?