Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
I'll wait until the holes actually exist to declare them holes.

 

They already exist. Lilly is out, Harden is gone, and the cast of characters to replace them is weak. We know Lilly is out after surgery, we don't know that he'll return to form. Waiting for them to clearly be massive would be a pretty reckless way of dealing with the situation. By then it's too late.

 

I don't think the answer to that is bringing in 1-2 more averagish guys. If they targeted a Bedard or Sheets, that'd be fine by me. But we don't need more rotation filler as much as we could use another top of the line type starter.

 

Problem is, we probably don't have the cash at this point to bring in that top of the line guy, so there's little we can do right now about the rotation.

 

I'm not asking for roster fillers, I've been hoping for a Harden replacement all offseason, which means an actual good pitcher. As it stands now, the rotation has holes, and the replacement of Bradley with Byrd isn't going to make up for that.

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I'll wait until the holes actually exist to declare them holes.

 

They already exist. Lilly is out, Harden is gone, and the cast of characters to replace them is weak. We know Lilly is out after surgery, we don't know that he'll return to form. Waiting for them to clearly be massive would be a pretty reckless way of dealing with the situation. By then it's too late.

 

I don't think the answer to that is bringing in 1-2 more averagish guys. If they targeted a Bedard or Sheets, that'd be fine by me. But we don't need more rotation filler as much as we could use another top of the line type starter.

 

Problem is, we probably don't have the cash at this point to bring in that top of the line guy, so there's little we can do right now about the rotation.

 

I'm not asking for roster fillers, I've been hoping for a Harden replacement all offseason, which means an actual good pitcher. As it stands now, the rotation has holes, and the replacement of Bradley with Byrd isn't going to make up for that.

 

That's what I'm saying. I want a top of the line starter, but I'm not sure there are any available in our price range (currently). Sheets and Bedard certainly are top of the line guys, but both are likely to be out of our price range.

Posted
Top of the line starter is the way to go. I also believe it is worth taking a risk on one of either Bedard or Sheets because they are free agents. The Cubs are good enough to make it to the playoffs this year, but I don't see their rotation being strong enough to capture the prize. So, if Ricketts doesn't open the wallet for the two prior mentioned pitchers, that leaves the team with a deadline deal for a pitcher or standing pat. I believe standing pat will get us bounced, and trading for a top pitcher will leave many of us mad over the talent given up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...