Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
In the situation he were to last to Boston or New York, I think both teams would give him that.
No doubt about that. They'll pay what it takes to get a player they want, slot recommendations be damned.

 

After the Gerrit Cole incident, I have to wonder with the Yankees.

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
In the situation he were to last to Boston or New York, I think both teams would give him that.
No doubt about that. They'll pay what it takes to get a player they want, slot recommendations be damned.

 

they'll go over slot, but 6 years and $50 million? that's not just going above slot, that's blowing the slotting system out of the water. that would piss off the commissioner's office and every other team in major league baseball. plus if strasburg is worth $50M, then how much is the next joe mauer worth? $25M? isn't the next justin upton or b.j. upton or whatever worth more than they got, because they're hardly 1/20th the player that strasburg is?

 

no mlb team wants to set a precedent of paying an amateur player $50M; it will not happen this year.

Posted
In the situation he were to last to Boston or New York, I think both teams would give him that.
No doubt about that. They'll pay what it takes to get a player they want, slot recommendations be damned.

 

After the Gerrit Cole incident, I have to wonder with the Yankees.

 

They didn't lose anything. With the new rules you get the pick back if you don't agree to a contract.

Guest
Guests
Posted
So you don't buy into the theory that pitches while fatigued do more damage?

 

Not significantly.

It may be that knowledge of materials is failing to apply to the human body here, but that just doesn't seem right. Can you explain why you're of that opinion? It seems contrary to most of what I've read on the subject, as well.

Posted

So Prior breaking down had nothing to do with the fact that you look at his pitch counts for 2003, especially September and after when he was averaging like 126 pitches a game, I mean, the pitch counts were abominable. You can point to Randy Johnson, but I don't judge anybody on the same scale I'd judge Randy Johnson, he's a freak of nature. Prior was 22 and he lead the majors in average pitches per game and basically every pitch count category, how often does that happen? Randy Johnson and then you have to way back to like, Steve Carlton or somebody, and things were so different back then I don't think it's an apt comparison.

 

Back to this Strasburg fellow. I don't understand why anyone would give him so much money. The list of uber-hard throwers is not as awesome as you might think. If this guy can throw 105 mph and be hurt a lot, is that better than throwing 98 and staying healthy?

 

Joel Zumaya's fastball is the one talked up the most currently in the majors, his career K/9 is not that great. Pat Neshek and his goofball delivery are about as effective as Zumaya's 102 mph fastball. Of course I think Pat Neshek's arm has now been severed.

 

Another thing, at least I, can't judge anything from the hype any more. I'm still smarting from back when the "experts" called Andrew Miller of the Marlins the next Randy Johnson. I wouldn't be surprised if we don't see another Randy Johnson for quite a long time.

Guest
Guests
Posted
why do we define 100+ pitches as "tired".

Why are you deflecting instead of answering simple questions? :)

 

Pick whatever cutoff you like or take it game by game and look for signs such as changing mechanics, loss of velocity, command or other factors. One way or another, I find it hard to believe that you don't see pitches while fatigued being harder on the arm.

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...
Posted
So if the Nats don't sign Strasburg this year, do they get the 2nd pick in the draft as compensation for him as part of the new rule?
Posted
So if the Nats don't sign Strasburg this year, do they get the 2nd pick in the draft as compensation for him as part of the new rule?

 

I think that is correct.

 

So they would have the #1 and #2 pick in the draft leading up to next year. What would really prevent them from being able to negotiate with Strasburg up until the draft next year. I realize its not really within league rules, but in this case why not make an exception since teams can strike pre-draft deals.

Guest
Guests
Posted
So if the Nats don't sign Strasburg this year, do they get the 2nd pick in the draft as compensation for him as part of the new rule?

 

I think that is correct.

 

So they would have the #1 and #2 pick in the draft leading up to next year. What would really prevent them from being able to negotiate with Strasburg up until the draft next year. I realize its not really within league rules, but in this case why not make an exception since teams can strike pre-draft deals.

 

Strasburg would have to give the Nationals permission to draft him again.

Posted
So if the Nats don't sign Strasburg this year, do they get the 2nd pick in the draft as compensation for him as part of the new rule?

 

I think that is correct.

 

So they would have the #1 and #2 pick in the draft leading up to next year. What would really prevent them from being able to negotiate with Strasburg up until the draft next year. I realize its not really within league rules, but in this case why not make an exception since teams can strike pre-draft deals.

 

Strasburg would have to give the Nationals permission to draft him again.

 

Is that new? Just thinking back to when we drafted Fuld again.

Guest
Guests
Posted
So if the Nats don't sign Strasburg this year, do they get the 2nd pick in the draft as compensation for him as part of the new rule?

 

I think that is correct.

 

So they would have the #1 and #2 pick in the draft leading up to next year. What would really prevent them from being able to negotiate with Strasburg up until the draft next year. I realize its not really within league rules, but in this case why not make an exception since teams can strike pre-draft deals.

 

Strasburg would have to give the Nationals permission to draft him again.

 

Is that new? Just thinking back to when we drafted Fuld again.

 

No, it's been around for a while now. It's not a big deal for a guy like Fuld who got drafted outside the first round both times (or Marquez Smith, Jordan Petraitis or even Andrew Cashner who was a 29th rounder the first time around).

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
The deadline for him to sign with the Nationals is just a few days away, correct? I've heard nothing of the negotiations. Are they going to get him signed or not?
Posted
The deadline for him to sign with the Nationals is just a few days away, correct? I've heard nothing of the negotiations. Are they going to get him signed or not?

 

Reportedly the Nationals' owner went out to meet with him. I'm guessing this will get done, but at the wire.

Posted
Let's say they do sign him. Can they afford to draft Harper then the next year?

 

I would hope so and even think so, but who knows. They seem like they could add some payroll unlike some other teams. Attracting FA's to play for them is another story all together.

Posted

The Nationals have offered a $17 million deal, with "easy to reach incentives" that would push it to $20 million.

 

Boras is talking $50 million. Has he finally lost it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...