Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

Posted

this either means that hoffpauir makes the roster or we sign someone wholly unacceptable to back up 3b/ss/2b.

 

let's hope it's hoffpauir. let's bet it's someone wholly unacceptable.

Posted
this either means that hoffpauir makes the roster or we sign someone wholly unacceptable to back up 3b/ss/2b.

 

let's hope it's hoffpauir. let's bet it's someone wholly unacceptable.

 

or gathright and so taguchi make the roster.

Posted
this either means that hoffpauir makes the roster or we sign someone wholly unacceptable to back up 3b/ss/2b.

 

let's hope it's hoffpauir. let's bet it's someone wholly unacceptable.

 

or gathright and so taguchi make the roster.

 

jesus, don't even say that.

Posted
First Howry, then Johnson now Aurillia. Sabeans been our guardian angel this off season.

 

hat's wrong with the unit? i'd have loved him on a one year deal if i knew we weren't get the peavster

Posted
First Howry, then Johnson now Aurillia. Sabeans been our guardian angel this off season.

 

hat's wrong with the unit? i'd have loved him on a one year deal if i knew we weren't get the peavster

 

Not for $8M with incentives.

Posted
First Howry, then Johnson now Aurillia. Sabeans been our guardian angel this off season.

 

hat's wrong with the unit? i'd have loved him on a one year deal if i knew we weren't get the peavster

 

Not for $8M with incentives.

 

I wouldn't give him that either (althrough he was def. worth that last season), but still..... it's not like Sabean was saving us from some awful player

Posted
First Howry, then Johnson now Aurillia. Sabeans been our guardian angel this off season.

 

hat's wrong with the unit? i'd have loved him on a one year deal if i knew we weren't get the peavster

 

Not for $8M with incentives.

 

I wouldn't give him that either (althrough he was def. worth that last season), but still..... it's not like Sabean was saving us from some awful player

 

We already have one pitcher in our rotation who we can pretty much guarantee misses significant playing time. Why have another?

Posted
First Howry, then Johnson now Aurillia. Sabeans been our guardian angel this off season.

 

hat's wrong with the unit? i'd have loved him on a one year deal if i knew we weren't get the peavster

 

Not for $8M with incentives.

 

I wouldn't give him that either (althrough he was def. worth that last season), but still..... it's not like Sabean was saving us from some awful player

 

We already have one pitcher in our rotation who we can pretty much guarantee misses significant playing time. Why have another?

 

Because they are good pitchers? So if someone said you could have another Rich Harden (I'm not saying Johnson is Harden, just giving an example), you wouldn't want it because you already have one?

 

Plus even though Johnson would be a health risk, I don't understand how you can pretty much guarantee he's miss significant time, considering he made 30 starts last season and has made less than that only one time in the last 5 seasons.

 

I mean, really, would 20-25 starts of an ERA around 4 on a one year deal be an awful thing?

Posted
First Howry, then Johnson now Aurillia. Sabeans been our guardian angel this off season.

 

hat's wrong with the unit? i'd have loved him on a one year deal if i knew we weren't get the peavster

 

Not for $8M with incentives.

 

I wouldn't give him that either (althrough he was def. worth that last season), but still..... it's not like Sabean was saving us from some awful player

 

We already have one pitcher in our rotation who we can pretty much guarantee misses significant playing time. Why have another?

 

Because they are good pitchers? So if someone said you could have another Rich Harden (I'm not saying Johnson is Harden, just giving an example), you wouldn't want it because you already have one?

 

Plus even though Johnson would be a health risk, I don't understand how you can pretty much guarantee he's miss significant time, considering he made 30 starts last season and has made less than that only one time in the last 5 seasons.

 

I mean, really, would 20-25 starts of an ERA around 4 on a one year deal be an awful thing?

 

If we had the money we did with the Trib, then sure, but as is now, we really couldnt afford to take a chance on such a thing.

Posted
First Howry, then Johnson now Aurillia. Sabeans been our guardian angel this off season.

 

hat's wrong with the unit? i'd have loved him on a one year deal if i knew we weren't get the peavster

 

Not for $8M with incentives.

 

I wouldn't give him that either (althrough he was def. worth that last season), but still..... it's not like Sabean was saving us from some awful player

 

We already have one pitcher in our rotation who we can pretty much guarantee misses significant playing time. Why have another?

 

Because they are good pitchers? So if someone said you could have another Rich Harden (I'm not saying Johnson is Harden, just giving an example), you wouldn't want it because you already have one?

 

Plus even though Johnson would be a health risk, I don't understand how you can pretty much guarantee he's miss significant time, considering he made 30 starts last season and has made less than that only one time in the last 5 seasons.

 

I mean, really, would 20-25 starts of an ERA around 4 on a one year deal be an awful thing?

 

If we had the money we did with the Trib, then sure, but as is now, we really couldnt afford to take a chance on such a thing.

 

On a one-year deal, I don't really see a problem. (Did he sign for more years? I'm not sure.)

 

If we have enough in the budget now, we could sign him and then, by the all-star break, I'd think Ricketts would be in place and could up our money available by 5-8 million for a deadline deal.

Posted
First Howry, then Johnson now Aurillia. Sabeans been our guardian angel this off season.

 

hat's wrong with the unit? i'd have loved him on a one year deal if i knew we weren't get the peavster

 

Not for $8M with incentives.

 

I wouldn't give him that either (althrough he was def. worth that last season), but still..... it's not like Sabean was saving us from some awful player

 

We already have one pitcher in our rotation who we can pretty much guarantee misses significant playing time. Why have another?

 

Because they are good pitchers? So if someone said you could have another Rich Harden (I'm not saying Johnson is Harden, just giving an example), you wouldn't want it because you already have one?

 

Plus even though Johnson would be a health risk, I don't understand how you can pretty much guarantee he's miss significant time, considering he made 30 starts last season and has made less than that only one time in the last 5 seasons.

 

I mean, really, would 20-25 starts of an ERA around 4 on a one year deal be an awful thing?

 

If we had the money we did with the Trib, then sure, but as is now, we really couldnt afford to take a chance on such a thing.

 

The payroll this year is bigger than it's ever been

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...