Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
vizquel's offensive numbers are as much a result of longevity as being particularly good

 

Being decent for a long period of time does have value. Whether Vizquel could be considered a decent hitter for that time is up for debate I guess.

 

i have a tough time using 3000 hits (for example) as a standard for induction if it took the player 22 years and 10,000 at bats to get there

 

that's still a .300 batting average.

 

true, but why is 3000/10,000 somehow better than 2,500/8,333?

 

Why is 200/600 somehow better than 1/3?

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...