Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

I wasn't talking about PERA, I was talking about FIP. There are several different peripheral ERAs.

 

 

it's similarly absurd to suggest that we should simply ignore this when considering a pitcher's relative success in a particular season.

 

I understand what you're saying but we should at least account for some of the pure luck and we should account for defense, but if you're not going to adjust those things you shouldn't used earned run average, you should use run average or even better fair RA.

 

I guess you'd also want to try to add "clutchiness" or whatever they have at fangraphs to the MVP award. Better yet, why don't we take the next step for starters and use WPA to analyze them. Even better, let's just give the award to a closer because in WPA there's simply no chance that a starter is more valuable than a closer. Eh, whatever. I don't agree with it, but there's enough room in the world for both schools of thought.

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...