Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

but statistics-wise Marshall and Marmol look like they've performed quite well for us.

 

My question is for all you guys who get to watch them day in and day out and possibly saw them in the minors...

 

Are they the real thing? Are either of them potential #2 or #3 starters in the bigs, or do you think they're putting up good numbers based on flukes, luck and possibly hitters not knowing them too well yet?

 

Basically, I guess I'm asking if the concensus is that they are future good starters for this team, or if we'd be better off packaging them in a trade at the deadline to get something to improve the team and take advantage of selling "high?"

Recommended Posts

Community Moderator
Posted
Marshall and Hill both have knee buckling curve balls. More experience is necessary, but I think all 4 of them (including Guzman) can be successful major league starters
Posted
Marmol definately looks like a solid #2 starter (at least) but Marshall could be as well though. Both need to improve their WHIP. Marshall also seems to be on and off with his performances - he'll be good one time out and bad another time out. Both need more time in the bigs and I will be disappointed if either is sent down to AAA this year.
Posted
From what I have seen it looks like Marshall is really good 4 out of 5 innings but he always has one bad inning

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...