Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Verified Member
Posted
yep, most significant thing taken from this is that the likelihood of the cubs being sold could be quite high.

 

would love to see cuban come in and spend $140 million next year.

 

I think I'd much rather see Cuban come in and install a different organizational philosophy than spend more money. The money was more than enough to get the job done but the team was constructed with faulty premises.

 

Yep, I'd rather see him spend the money on bribing the A's and Braves scouts/minor league coaches to come over.

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
yep, most significant thing taken from this is that the likelihood of the cubs being sold could be quite high.

 

would love to see cuban come in and spend $140 million next year.

 

I think I'd much rather see Cuban come in and install a different organizational philosophy than spend more money. The money was more than enough to get the job done but the team was constructed with faulty premises.

 

I agree with the latter as it's proven over the decades to be the only true way to long-term winning, although having a somewhat unfettered budget to contend year to year in the meantime would also be appreciated. However, just setting some arbitrary dollar amount to spend to in advance is what fenced in Hendry, no matter the amount. That what causes getting a bunch of mid-income "once were" or role player types to fill out the roster and never willing to chase the real talent. The philosophy should always be to get the guys that make sense from a baseball perspective and let the amount spent fall where it may.

Posted
Every time the Cubs lose, they'll cut to a hilarious camera shot of Jazz being hurled out of the front entrance of Wrigley. Works for me!
Posted
Anyone who thinks Ernie would be more than a PR figurehead for the group is fooling themselves. Ernie has had some financial problems over the years and isn't very likely to be able to contribute much financially. By the way, for all of those owners who claim they are "losing" money, the Tribune bought the Cubs for 21 million in 1981 and now they're worth over 500 million.
Posted
Anyone who thinks Ernie would be more than a PR figurehead for the group is fooling themselves. Ernie has had some financial problems over the years and isn't very likely to be able to contribute much financially. By the way, for all of those owners who claim they are "losing" money, the Tribune bought the Cubs for 21 million in 1981 and now they're worth over 500 million.

 

In other news, water is wet and we need air to live!

Posted
Anyone who thinks Ernie would be more than a PR figurehead for the group is fooling themselves. Ernie has had some financial problems over the years and isn't very likely to be able to contribute much financially. By the way, for all of those owners who claim they are "losing" money, the Tribune bought the Cubs for 21 million in 1981 and now they're worth over 500 million.

 

I was watching "Chicago Tonight" a while back(last summer, I think) when Bob Sirott was still hosting and he had a chat with the managing editor(I think was his title) of Crane's Chicago Business who was a frequent guest on the show.

 

Anyways they were talking about the speculation of the Tribune selling the Cubs. And this guest went on to say that the selling of the Cubs is far from unfathomable. Bob Sirott questioned the motive to sell when they have made such a profit in the purchase just as you stated, "21 million in 1981 and now they're worth over 500 million". The guest From Crane's Chicago Business explained that as long as the Cubs keep the team it is just that......a number. If it is/was about money than they would/will just cash in that cow(i.e. sell).

Posted
he better have a huge financial backer, because its gonna cost him a small fortune.

 

Yup... $600-$800 million.

 

so are we saying they won't take my 400 millon in cash I was going to offer them?

 

How about stones group joining Ernie?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Anyone who thinks Ernie would be more than a PR figurehead for the group is fooling themselves. Ernie has had some financial problems over the years and isn't very likely to be able to contribute much financially. By the way, for all of those owners who claim they are "losing" money, the Tribune bought the Cubs for 21 million in 1981 and now they're worth over 500 million.

 

I was watching "Chicago Tonight" a while back(last summer, I think) when Bob Sirott was still hosting and he had a chat with the managing editor(I think was his title) of Crane's Chicago Business who was a frequent guest on the show.

 

Anyways they were talking about the speculation of the Tribune selling the Cubs. And this guest went on to say that the selling of the Cubs is far from unfathomable. Bob Sirott questioned the motive to sell when they have made such a profit in the purchase just as you stated, "21 million in 1981 and now they're worth over 500 million". The guest From Crane's Chicago Business explained that as long as the Cubs keep the team it is just that......a number. If it is/was about money than they would/will just cash in that cow(i.e. sell).

 

Well, only if you thought the value was going to go down. As long as it continues to rise, just hang on to the coat-tails and let her go.

 

......which is probably what the Trib is doing, come to think of it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...