Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • entries
    34
  • comments
    35
  • views
    30,878

Cubs Land Ryan Brasier: Why I love this move


Cubs Video

Hello Cubs World,

WELL ISNT THIS CONVENIENT!!!

Jed's Dead with Delight

Man, did this play right into Jed Hoyer's hand. You couldn't author a better situation for his brand of dealmaking = more importantly, it is a great fit for our swiss army knife approach to the bullpen. He wasn't even the worst 26th man on the Dodgers roster, just the odd man out for Kirby Yates by a small margin. Three lesser pitchers have Dodger jobs simply for role reasons, and the rest are projected to vie for top 20 type elite results (even though we know half of those will be hurt). 

You see folks, Ryan Brasier fits right into the Cubs' school of thought for pitching. He keeps walks low, relies on command and confusion, and generates a ton of chase swings instead of whiffs. He doesn't throw many balls and pounds the strike zone with ground ball inducing sliders and sinkers, but when he does throw junk, everyone chases it way above league average. Put simply, he LOOKS easy to hit even though he isn't, and can make good hitters swing at garbage.  

Comparing the Options: Brasier versus my own Jensen/Robertson Preferences 

Ryan is intimidating. He doesn't achieve this through velocity or strikeouts, but rather through psychologically dominating the opponent with many "ghost peripherals" such as extension and statistical advantage. His one unique offering to the squad is the ability to smoothly toggle between a righty sinker strtikeouT ptich and a lefty cutter strikeout pitch, while leading the way with a bread and butter, almost Kerry Woods slider that is increasingly rare in the league, despite being dominant 15 years ago. Thus he is simultaneously a Cubs style pitcher while also having his own unique repertoire for achieving the results  

Ryan Brasier Stats: Statcast, Visuals & Advanced Metrics | baseballsavant.com

He leads with a rather classic slider that he uses over 40 percent of the time. He commands the slider very precisely in a small range, and compliments that with a 4 seamer, sinker, and cutter. he has a pretty smooth distribution chart of pitch types- he paints a smooth range of outcomes on a righty arc and uses all four pitches over 10 percent. Batters have to be prepared for pretty much any type of horizonal or vertical break, anywhere in the strike zone. This is the preferred pitch chart for a Cubs pitcher these days - more offerings, smooth command across a range of types, no free passes to first, and no clear "tells" that the next pitch is coming in a particular part of the strike zone. His high extension also makes him look like a 97 mph fireballer despite being close to average, which saves us on injury risks. 

In some ways he's the inverse of Kenley Jansen and David Robertson. Both of those guys are from a prior generation, and succeeded at it, which makes them increasingly unusual for today's hitters. They both go for whiffs and dont rely on chases.  Both heavily lean on plus-plus cutters and use them all day long, rather than sliders or 4 seam fastballs, whereas most other power pitchers work in reverse. And, both use their secondary pitches to create confusion without painting a smooth arc across the chart. Instead, their pitches each have as dramatically different shape from each other as humanly possible, daring batters to adjust to such extreme differences rather than worry about tipping the batter off that such a pitch may be coming. In other words, they ram hard to hit pitches down your throat and don't worry about smoothly disguising these nasty pitches. 

Personally, I still wanted a Robertson or Jansen to break up the monotony of Cubs style pitching. Even still, if I'm Jed  Hoyer, I have confidence that Brasier can repeat last season easily, with just small tweaks, and low risk of blowout arm. 

On the other hand, if we are gonna stick with the Cubs new school philosophy, Brasier was one of the best options on the market this year. He has recently been the poster child for the Cubs style success since adding his cutter to his mix in 2023 and dialing back the 4 seamer. 

I cant give the team any MOJO bonuses for improving their diversity of pitching styles out of the bullpen. 
 Still, he's at least as good as Ryan Pressly in 2025, for a bargain price.

Hat tip to you, Jed, for making this work- he's worth every penny at roughly 5 million for a 1.5 WAR setup guy, whereas we are paying 8.5 million for Pressly as a 1.5 WAR projected closer (by my own numbers). 
I just wish he was a lefty. 

Cubs Bullpen Revisited

Cubs's back five now consists of: 
Ryan Pressly, Porter Hodge, Ryan Brasier, Caleb Theilbar, and Tyson Miller. 

Based on their combined 2023-2024 performances, this is the best backend to a bullpen in the national league central division OVERALL, despite a lack of a true top 20 relief pitcher in the bunch. The righties are all projected as rank 20-50 bullpen arms in MLB, with Hodge surprisingly leading the statistical charge here. Thielbar is probably the steal of the bunch if he remains healthy, in terms of players being paid below their true worth, and I have him as atop 50 reliever and a rank 10-15ish bullpen lefty. I would have given a .5 WAR MOJO bonus to adding the unusual offerings of Robertson or Jansen, but Brasier is good enough to match their performance in 2025. That's still a ton of talent. I would summarize this as an 8th ranked MLB bullpen because of its insane depth in the minors, and 4th in NL.  

Conclusion
 

Sign Alex Bregman, and lets goooo. That's the final step for this juggernaut roster. Bregman plus Brasier brings us up to about 98 wins before injury, and 95.5 after adjustment. Its not my highest war calculation for this season, but its enough to scare even the Dodgers. I still wanted Tanner Scott and Randal Grichuk to make it all add up, but I'll take the trio of Pressly, Brasier, and Bregman as a close plan B. 

Okay, that's a contender for a World Series. 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Edited by ryanrc

7 Comments


Recommended Comments

MGriffin

Posted

Even pessimistic me is starting to get on board a little bit with this team.  Signing Brasier seems like a great move.  With Jed solidifying the bullpen, 90 or more wins is starting to seem achievable.  My only gripe is the future - it seems like there's a lot of key players signed to 1 year deals.   Will the Cubs be able to replace (or resign) them over the 2025/26 offseason to build a sustainable contender, or is this just Jed spending money and positioning the Cubs so that he gets an extension?

  • Like 1
Brandon Glick

Posted

Nice write-up and perspective on the move. I'm not a huge fan — I continue to clamor for the Cubs to spend MORE on less guys rather a medium amount on a bunch of medium-tier guys — but insofar as this is the team-building philosophy, I think you're right on the money. Excited to see Brasier handle a leverage role, especially since it's just better than years past when guys like Yency Almonte and José Cuas were given those innings.

  • Like 1
ryanrc

Posted

8 hours ago, Brandon Glick said:

Nice write-up and perspective on the move. I'm not a huge fan — I continue to clamor for the Cubs to spend MORE on less guys rather a medium amount on a bunch of medium-tier guys — but insofar as this is the team-building philosophy, I think you're right on the money. Excited to see Brasier handle a leverage role, especially since it's just better than years past when guys like Yency Almonte and José Cuas were given those innings.

yeah, as I said before, I was seriously annoyed when the Cubs failed to land Scott, because the price wasn't outrageous- it squarely fit his 3+ WAR projections. However, the Pressly/Brasier combo, if healthy, should add up to almost the same! 

Yeah, i hear you in regards to spending on superstars instead of solid players. However, the Cubs had GOOD REASON to do that in 2021-2024. It was a rebuilding period, and they wanted to field a good enough team to keep fans happy while rebuilding. Furthermore, if you dont have to spend and instead you land prospects like Busch , isn't that even better? I give Hoyer credit for steadily improving the team.

Now, we've got a clear chance to seal up the best roster since 2019, and maybe even the best since 2016. There's precisely enough money to land the 3rd best overall 3rd baseman in the league, coming off a gold glove season, projected to contribute 4- 4.5 WAR annually for the next few years.  Shaw really can't compete with Bregman yet. His glove is still below MLB average at 3rd, and it will take a couple of years for him to develop Bregman's power. 3rd base is a hard position, and most teams either give up and stick a bat there or a pure glove, because there's not enough multi-tool guys who have mastered the hot corner.

I think Shaw will still be a better 2nd baseman in this league- its his natural position, especially at 5 foot 9. Its his preferred spot. I expect him to replace Hoerner in 2027, and I do NOT Expect us to trade Hoerner early. Give Shaw 2 years to develop, like just Hoerner and most other guys before him. no need to rush. He's under team control for 5 MORE years.   

  • Like 1
Brandon Glick

Posted

6 hours ago, ryanrc said:

yeah, as I said before, I was seriously annoyed when the Cubs failed to land Scott, because the price wasn't outrageous- it squarely fit his 3+ WAR projections. However, the Pressly/Brasier combo, if healthy, should add up to almost the same! 

Yeah, i hear you in regards to spending on superstars instead of solid players. However, the Cubs had GOOD REASON to do that in 2021-2024. It was a rebuilding period, and they wanted to field a good enough team to keep fans happy while rebuilding. Furthermore, if you dont have to spend and instead you land prospects like Busch , isn't that even better? I give Hoyer credit for steadily improving the team.

Now, we've got a clear chance to seal up the best roster since 2019, and maybe even the best since 2016. There's precisely enough money to land the 3rd best overall 3rd baseman in the league, coming off a gold glove season, projected to contribute 4- 4.5 WAR annually for the next few years.  Shaw really can't compete with Bregman yet. His glove is still below MLB average at 3rd, and it will take a couple of years for him to develop Bregman's power. 3rd base is a hard position, and most teams either give up and stick a bat there or a pure glove, because there's not enough multi-tool guys who have mastered the hot corner.

I think Shaw will still be a better 2nd baseman in this league- its his natural position, especially at 5 foot 9. Its his preferred spot. I expect him to replace Hoerner in 2027, and I do NOT Expect us to trade Hoerner early. Give Shaw 2 years to develop, like just Hoerner and most other guys before him. no need to rush. He's under team control for 5 MORE years.   

Agreed on everything. Landing Bregman absolutely makes this team better in the short-term, and is the exact kind of high-priced, big-talent free agent I've been wanting to see the team splurge on for five years.

That said, I'd be stunned if the team didn't trade Hoerner immediately after a Bregman signing. I want him to stay as one of the last remaining vestiges of that old core (even if he wasn't on the championship team), but the money just won't work under the restrictions the Ricketts have supposedly laid down. They want Shaw to play now with the upside in his bat, and better to let him develop and find his swing while on a Pre-Arb contract than closer to free agency.

Regardless, I think Hoyer's actually done a fine job this offseason. Brasier and Pressly were smart additions to the pen. Bregman would be the cherry on top.

ryanrc

Posted

2 minutes ago, Brandon Glick said:

Agreed on everything. Landing Bregman absolutely makes this team better in the short-term, and is the exact kind of high-priced, big-talent free agent I've been wanting to see the team splurge on for five years.

That said, I'd be stunned if the team didn't trade Hoerner immediately after a Bregman signing. I want him to stay as one of the last remaining vestiges of that old core (even if he wasn't on the championship team), but the money just won't work under the restrictions the Ricketts have supposedly laid down. They want Shaw to play now with the upside in his bat, and better to let him develop and find his swing while on a Pre-Arb contract than closer to free agency.

Regardless, I think Hoyer's actually done a fine job this offseason. Brasier and Pressly were smart additions to the pen. Bregman would be the cherry on top.

I disagree, there are many ways to make it work. 
First, you backload Bregman a bit. 
Second, you trade away a couple of our insanely long list of pitchers. Nate Pearson, for example, is expendable. He had a very tiny sample of great pitching, and he is high risk. 
That gives you JUST enough cushion. We can reclaim a couple million by sending a prospect and a pitcher off. There's tricks we can do. 

Or, my favorite option: as injures pop up around the league, trade Taillon instead of Hoerner. I understand he has a no -trade clause, but he may get the chance to move up a spot in the rotation for another competitive team/
 

Brandon Glick

Posted

8 hours ago, ryanrc said:

I disagree, there are many ways to make it work. 
First, you backload Bregman a bit. 
Second, you trade away a couple of our insanely long list of pitchers. Nate Pearson, for example, is expendable. He had a very tiny sample of great pitching, and he is high risk. 
That gives you JUST enough cushion. We can reclaim a couple million by sending a prospect and a pitcher off. There's tricks we can do. 

Or, my favorite option: as injures pop up around the league, trade Taillon instead of Hoerner. I understand he has a no -trade clause, but he may get the chance to move up a spot in the rotation for another competitive team/
 

Oh listen, I hope you're right. I'd love them to find a way to keep the gang together with Bregman in tow.

I'd personally just be shocked if they did it that way. Based on everything we're hearing, it feels like moving Hoerner for more pitching is the play if they get another bat. Maybe's that changed since they added Pressly and Brasier, but his contract and position make the most sense to move off if they add another infielder, assuming the Cubs are serious about giving Shaw serious playing time in 2025.

I'm all aboard the "trade Taillon" train. That would be my course of action as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...