I like PER. I think it sums up the stats you provided above nicely. But it does a poor job evaluating defense. For instance, Ben Wallace produced a 17.54 PER this year. Do you think Fyre was the better player? I expect Tyson's PER to rebound next year, and Fyre has a ways to go before he's in the same class defensively as Tyson. I also have my doubts about its predictive value, especially when looking at the first few seasons of a player's career. Diaw jumps from 8.82 and 9.97 to 17.31. Noch jumps form 9.96 to 16.12. Frye was a pretty good defensive player in college. I think he will get better up front. What hurts Tyson, though, is that he has never been able to stay on the court for extended periods of time. He gets way too many ticky tack fouls that kill our interior presence. In his one season in the NBA, Frye averaged approx 1 foul per 8 minutes while Chandler was at 1 in less than 7 minutes. Those extra 5-6 minutes a game on the floor are critical. Also bear in mind how much "softer" Tyson has to play when he's being cognizant of his foul issues. I think Tyson is a decent role player, but not for the money he's making. Would be nice to have a real center who could draw some attention. Not to mention three glorious years under team control before drawing a moderately sized payday.