BECAUSE HE WAS 23 WHEN HE PUT UP THOSE NUMBERS. PS - love the straw man. Why don't you do a quick check of the minor league numbers of every hall of famer. I don't know, but I'm willing to bet that most of them put up pretty good numbers in the minors. Does that mean that everyone who puts up great numbers in the minors is a hall of famer? No, but your lame argument doesn't hold any more water than that one. AND HE WAS 22 WHEN HE PUT UP GREAT NUMBERS IN THE MINORS THE YEAR BEFORE THAT. Did he suddenly forget how to hit because he aged a year? I don't care how young he was. He sucked. This is a classic case of a guy who can't hit major league pitching. You're really this dense? He was 24 last year and put up great numbers. Maybe he suddenly learned how to hit again! If Cedeno had gone down to Iowa last year and continued to suck, I would have written him off. He showed very little in his year with the Cubs and I was worried that it was more than youth - that he was really just bad and 2005 was a fluke. But then he went down and basically matched his '05 numbers in '07. So now what's the real Cedeno? '05 and '07 of .900+ OPS from a young shortstop? Or '06, .600-ish OPS from a young shortstop? I haven't the foggiest idea, but as between a 25-year-old Cedeno who has 2 great AAA seasons in the last 3 years and a 28-year-old Theriot who...doesn't, I'll take Cedeno. We're not giving up ARod, we're not even giving up Eckstein, we're giving up a bad player for a younger one with potential. He was 23 and trying to hit major league pitching. Maybe he'll never be able to, but there are a lot of guys who would hit terribly in the majors at 23 who went on to be great players. Many great major leaguers aren't even in AAA at 23. If you forced every player to play a full year in the majors when they were 23 and decided based on those numbers alone whether they would ever be any good, you'd lose a lot of great players (and, more importantly for our purposes, you'd miss out on a huge number of average and good players who just weren't good enough to hit major league pitching at 23). I don't care what he has done in the minors. He can dominate and hit 400 home runs per year, but if he sucks at the major league level, then who cares? Yes, he went back to Iowa this year and tore it up. He then returned to Chicago and looked awful. Like he did all of last year. So he's great in the minors and terrible in the majors. Does that sum it up pretty accurately? You want to hand him the job over Theriot next year because of his potential? Theriot has been better, much better, than Cedeno in his major league career. Why should he have his job stripped from him and handed to a guy who, in 700 major league at bats, hasn't shown that he knows how to hit at this level? If our two options next year are Theriot and Cedeno, Ryan should be the starter. If he gets hurt, then let's see if Ronny can improve on that 53 OPS+ that he put up in '06. But he shouldn't just be given the job because he's better against minor league pitching. That's absurd.