Butler's terrible. IU should have won that game by 30 -- though, honestly, if they could make layups (Watford can't), they would have. I wouldn't go that far. Butler still has some guys that can play but obviously it is going to take them a while to get it together. They didn't look very good early last season either. Butler is a team that is good at making a game look ugly and that is how they hang around. I mean Louisville is currently ranked #8 and they played a very similar game against Butler...led by a point at the half, pulled away to a 16 point win. That isn't to say I am comparing IU to UL but I'm just saying to presume we would beat Butler by 30, I can't say I would think that. I figured we would win by double digits and so I'm fine with the result we got. IU didn't play Butler at the end of the season; IU played Butler last night. Whether Butler improves as the season progresses is of no moment. Butler has been bad this year and was bad last night. IU played a miserable first half -- Butler gets some credit for that, they do play tougher, more physical defense compared to the other five schlubs IU has defeated this year. If IU doesn't play better Wednesday night, they'll lose. If they don't play better over the course of the season, they won't win nearly as many games as I'm starting to think they might. I was pretty pleased with the second half, though. I just think you are over-stating how bad they are. Based on the raw results of their games, yeah I wasn't expecting much but then actually seeing Butler play last night they aren't totally devoid of talent. Chris-shawn Thomas looks promising, they still have Nored and Marshall...I think Butler will get better for sure. It can't be easy starting the season with an entirely new lineup and rotation. I don't think IU played their best basketball last night either. I think it was good for IU to play a team that gets very physical on defense.