If my rant duplicates another thread, feel free to act accordingly and merger or purge. I see people wanting Dusty run out of town on a rail. Look, a lot of times I share the feeling. But honestly, what the heck difference does the manager really make? I've made my case in a few other threads, I know. I hardly post here so I don't necessarily expect people to care all that much what I think. After all, I'm just another fan who pretends to have answers. But I like to think my answers ring true somewhat. How much control does a manager truly have in terms of wins and losses? Riddle me this, would any manager past or present turn the Pirates or Royals into contenders? Um, no. Now how about them Cubbies? Well we started the year with oh, two proven starters. Maddux and Zambrano. We tried plugging the holes with Jerome Williams, Glendon Rusch and Sean Marshall. Well we all know how that worked. Williams pitched himself into the minors. Rusch pitched himself into the bullpen. So now we have Rich Hill and Angel Guzman joining Sean Marshall in our 3/5 rookie starting rotation. As far as the everday lineup, we have one OF who has consistently hit the ball in Matt Murton. Pierre and Jones have struggled to high heaven. Our offensive MVP DLee is hurt. Our 2nd best hitter Aram has been in a slump. Todd Walker is forced to play out of position and has slumped. Cedeno has been a beacon of light in the darkness for the most part. Barrett can hit, we know that. So we have a depleted starting rotation and an everday lineup populated by a lot of struggling hitters. So.....should it be such a shock the Cubs stand at 15-19? I'm not even a Dusty apologist but what freaking manager would do much better with this wreck of a team???? I've never felt the manager made much difference. Either you have players or you don't. Hell, the Diamondbacks made a freaking broadcaster the manager and won it all. And even at that, Bob Brenly took plenty heat until his team won it all. And now he annouces for us. Did Joe Torre get a brain transplant between St Louis and New York? A manager generally is only as good as his personnel. Now, I know good and well you folks can come up with a multitude of issues with Dusty. Okay, but we still don't have the players. And people can always have issues with the manager. There are folks in St Louis who want LaRussa out. Torre is always on the hot seat despite however many titles he won in New York. To me, it gets down to one thing. If the Cubs are running the organization properly from top to bottom then the manager should not matter much at all. But human nature is to throw the manager/coach under the bus. It never fails. Grass is always greener on the other side and so forth. I'm telling you, we can fire Dusty Baker today and it isn't going to make a damn bit of difference in the long-term without other changes. All I suggest is take a step back and look at more than the manager. If you have followed the Cubs for any length of time, I think you realize changing captains is about as effective as re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic. And for the cynics, I have no love for Dusty clouding my judgment. I just see things for what they are. And the freaking manager isn't the problem here. Management perhaps. Thus ends my rant. Make of it what you will. They can fire Dusty tomorrow but that isn't solving anything if that is the only move. Sincerely, A Cubs fan who cares