That's for sure. He was a little more hesitant to make this change, but when push came to shove, he made it. I think he gave Orton every chance to keep the job. I think Lovie played this about as good as one could have. Indeed. I think one thing to take into consideration is how healthy Rex truly was before today. I think that if he was in better condition, Kyle might have gotten the hook in a quicker fashion. I wanted Rex earlier, but I can't really complain about Lovie's timeline. When I saw Rex getting ready to come in I bolted up in my seat (went from laying down on my couch to sitting somewhat upright really) and was pumped. That was a move that had to be done. And I'm somewhat happy it happened midgame. I feel the hype surrounding Rex's first appearance being announced days in advance would have been too much of a distraction, and I don't like QB's to be too jacked up for a game, which he would have been if he was named starter on Tuesday before the game. Now he got the first game action jitters out of the way. He's also going to a place where he has already won in the past. Did anybody notice Peter King's fine fifteen note on the Bears? Last week he had the Bears 8th, after the Pittsburgh loss. Dallas, Tampa, Carolina and Pitt were all behind the Bears, and Atlanta was 15th. He basically said the loss to Pitt wasn't that big of a deal. This week he moved the Bears down to 10th, and put Carolina and Pittsburgh ahead of the Bears. Pitt, I won't argue. But the Bears just swept the NFC South, they already beat Carolina and dominated a good team at home one week after a loss that he said wasn't a big deal. How do they go down? And later he said: "How are the Bears going to win in January with that offense?" Does anybody think Peter went to bed a little early on Sunday after coming off a caffeine high? No mention of Grossman. The team was rated lower after winning a big game at home against a good but desperate team (desperate teams usually win even matchups). Peter, they aren't going to battle with the offense you last saw. Grossman won't put up 300 yards and 3 TDs a game, but this team no longer has to hold the opposition to less than 7 to have a good chance to win. Agreed I thought the timing was good too. Rex said he felt fully healthy for the Pitt game for the first time. So basically Lovie gave Kyle a game and a half to show him something, and Kyle didnt step up to the challenge. Rex is going to take more chances and he will probably throw a pick here and there while taking a chance. However, with the Bears D they can afford a pick like last nights(if it wasnt fumbled) because more than likely Atl isnt going to drive 99 yards on them so the Bears would have got the ball back with good field position and been in a position to score again. If Grossman can come in and score 10 points a half(which is more than Kyle was doint) I like our chances in any game as I dont see our D giving up more than 20 points to very many teams. As for Peter King, it doesnt surprise me. Watching Cold Pizza today and Skip Bayless had Carolina as the #1 team in the NFC with the Bears 2nd and the Seahawks 4th. How can anyone put Carolina ahead of the Bears after the way the Bears handled them and the entire NFC South. Also how can the Seahawks be #4? While I dont think they are as good as their record, they have to be a top 2 team along with the Bears. Also I would like the Bears chances against Seattle. The Bears showed last night against the #1 running team in the NFL that you cant run on them, and that was with 3 starters out.