I didn't see anything wrong with the game plan vs. the Steelers. :confused: Sure, there were times when I wish they would've been less conservative, like the 3rd and long draw and the final FG drive, but they attacked that blitz brilliantly, IMO. 1) They got lucky against the Steelers. They lose that game if Reed doesn't miss a couple kicks. 2) Maybe I'm not giving coaching enough credit here, but it seemed less like game planning and more like Knox and Cutler making some really good plays that accounted for the offense. It just seemed like much of what worked were broken plays that were improvised. I'll give Turner credit for the play with Olsen going vertical down the middle of the field...that was well designed. I just don't have a lot of confidence in him. The Steelers probably dont score a TD if Mark Anderson isnt a damn idiot and shove a guy right into the ref, resulting in a 1st down, instead of 3rd and long. Kicking is part of the game, and the weather and field werent ideal for kicking. The Bears kicker is used to Soldier Field and he made his kicks, its called home field advantage. The Steelers had some luck for them also. The Anderson play, the crazy ass Mendenhall run falling down behind the line of scrimmage and somehow getting a 1st down out of it.