Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Hairyducked Idiot

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    39,504
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    46

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Hairyducked Idiot

  1. Not sure I buy that when the TV contract money is virtually guaranteed to be coming in and we're not spending a dime of it. Yeah, I'll believe it when I see it. Ricketts is way past getting the benefit of the doubt with me on stuff like that.
  2. IIRC, the report was that the custom steel pieces they would need would have a long lag time and need to be ordered more than six months in advance. Like, the actual supports that would hold up the stadium after they re-gut the underneaths.
  3. OK, you've got the land for free. Where's the money for the actual building of the stadium going to come from? That's a $500m-$1b outlay.
  4. There is no plausible combination of events that would cause the Cubs to leave Wrigley Field. You'd need an alternative location that wasn't a total backwater that was also willing to foot the entire cost of a new stadium. No matter how frustrated Ricketts gets, it'd still be better for the bottom-line long term to bite the bullet and pay for the new clubhouse and other renovations out of pocket (just slash another $40m off of payroll or something) without the new signage and other revenue generators.
  5. There was a fun article in one of the SABR journals a few years back about the reverse of that. For some period in the 19th century, the rule was that a ball was fair if it landed fair, without having to pass either base. So some hitters mastered "fair-foul hitting," where they'd try to chop down on the ball and have it hit the ground in front of the plate with backspin, going straight back behind the catcher.
  6. It might as well be a blank card. He can play it if he wants, but it doesn't mean anything because it's as empty a threat as there could possibly be.
  7. So we're 5th in MLB in HRs, we're getting some production from C and 3b, our relief pitching fWAR is 17th. So we basically managed to fix everything from last year and find a whole new set of holes.
  8. *Two* starting pitchers in one day with more than 1 K/inning. I feel spoiled.
  9. i havent looked surely they can't be that ba :shock: Ryan Harvey at 21 in A+ 24.7% K, 5.1% BB Javier Baez at 20 in A+ this year 27.7% , 3.6% The power is insane, the age is great for the leagues he's played in, but everything else has been horrorshow.
  10. Because the first part is meaningless and the second part is OK because his fastball is really good.
  11. Edwin Jackson can start having his ERA move toward his peripherals any day now. It'd be cool with me.
  12. I kind of see how people are superficially seeing a fit between the Cubs and Rays for Price, but I just think the cons outweigh the pros in terms of likelihood of it happening. We're going to pay a huge haul of prospects *and* a massive contract extension for a pitcher who turns 30 during our first "ready to compete" year? Tampa Bay's going to find what it wants in a system that has very little in terms of impact prospects above A-ball (though some of them might have had a small taste of AA by the end of the year)? All for a pitcher who is a 2-win improvement over a guy on Garza's level? Not that two-win improvements aren't important, but it seems like this front office would want to pick up a bunch of the cheaper, less commital improvement options we have available to us. The only way it makes sense for us is if we're trying to turn on the switch and be a 90+ win team in 2014, and I don't see how we're likely to get there even with a Price trade. The only way it makes sense for Tampa Bay is if they *really* like Baez or Soler even more than most people.
  13. Despite the implications of the question, I don't recall ever being outraged by the Kevin Gregg signing. Mostly because at the time he was picked up, I assumed he was just AAA organizational fodder. When he got called up, it was more amusing than anything. He's always had good strikeout stuff. Somehow I'm guessing he didn't suddenly learn command at 35 and will probably go back to being the same old replacement level pitcher he's been for awhile. But it'd be cool if he actually were good.
  14. He's been proving from day one that MWL pitching is no problem for him, the homers were always going to come. It's amazing to actually have some power in the organization all of a sudden. Baez's is attached to some major concerns, Soler's is sort of slow to show up this spring, and Vogelbach's comes with a terrible defensive projection, but power is the rarest commodity in the game these days and it wasn't long ago that we had none of it.
  15. Ransom is still awful, though I'm not complaining that we're getting some small bit out of him for the moment. Gregg would be a fascinating find if he can keep it up. Maybe our FO is finally finding its mojo on cheap pickups.
  16. Torreyes had six more PAs without a K today. I'm fascinated by him.
  17. The Padres are really awful and would be last in almost everything if not for the Marlins. I'm looking forward to another series where we prove that we may not be good, but we don't belong with this bunch. Anything less than 3/4 would be quite disappointing, especially at home with the rotation lined up well.
  18. You shouldn't. Some fans, it seems, have very weird ideas about what sample size means, and they severely underestimate how quickly you can start to find interesting things in the types of data we have available to us these days. "Interesting" meaning some non-zero chance that we're seeing real information and not noise in the statistics.
  19. I mean technically nothing is a bad depth move if all it costs you is an Iowa roster spot, but Chris Nelson is super awful and I want no chance of him appearing on an MLB roster for us at any point.
  20. And another error, is he making an alarming amount? Or is his the typical lower minors amount? Both? It's typical of young SS's, and also typical of young SS's to not make it as SS's.
×
×
  • Create New...