Awesome. Not all good news though, Kyle. Addison only has a .955 OPS thru 19 ABs. Can't win em all. Meh. I'm not going to care about Spring Training stats unless they make prime Bonds blush.
I think you're the only one who remembers his 1998 (I almost said 2008... ugh, I'm old.) April the way I do...where he hit like eleventy warning track flies with the wind howling in, turning what would've been a torrid start into an awful one. I'm irrationally convinced that with some BABIP luck, he would have hung around long enough to get "established MLB starter" pixie dust sprinkled on him and he would have hung around for like 15 career WAR.
*shrug* Annoying or not, it's accurate. Baseball being the reason for baseball results is usually about sixth on their list of explanations, after morality, chemistry, fate, character and clutchiness. I don't even think you realize you aren't saying anything. :good:
*shrug* Annoying or not, it's accurate. Baseball being the reason for baseball results is usually about sixth on their list of explanations, after morality, chemistry, fate, character and clutchiness.
Because people, and *especially* the media, are slaves to narrative. We want to impose narrative on everything because we don't like randomness as an explanation. "The Cubs are on an intermediate step in their ascent to greatness" is a narrative too good to resist. It's way preferable to "The Cubs are a baseball team who will play baseball games and maybe win a lot of them but who knows because baseball is weird." it's preferable because your story is dumb My story is more accurate than theirs.
Because people, and *especially* the media, are slaves to narrative. We want to impose narrative on everything because we don't like randomness as an explanation. "The Cubs are on an intermediate step in their ascent to greatness" is a narrative too good to resist. It's way preferable to "The Cubs are a baseball team who will play baseball games and maybe win a lot of them but who knows because baseball is weird."
Having been yelled at by Mets' fans for not seeing the value of building a team around pitching, I find it completely comical. I wonder how that Mets board is reacting to this. It's pretty hilarious. They are simultaneously bemoaning their luck and shouting down anyone who says this *might* be a systemic problem of focusing on pitchers. "What do you mean we should have traded some of them for bats? But then we'd have even *less* pitching when one gets hurt?"