The chess.com report mainly shows that he cheated online a lot more than he admitted to at this point, including in some events for prize money. Historically, online chess was never considered serious because it would be practically impossible to stop cheating. As long as the cheaters aren't stupid or overly greedy, then can goose up their results a little bit by checking their phones on key moves once in awhile. When the pandemic hit, there were some attempts to bring serious competitive chess online with some prize money, but everyone kinda knew that trying to keep cheating out of it would be like trying to keep PEDs out of the tour de France. People won't be happy with him for cheating in prize money events online, but that's still a much lesser sin than cheating OTB (over the board). They still don't have conclusive proof that he cheated against Carlsen. The "irregularities" in other otb games are awfully thin. The best analogy I've seen so far is that he's a B student with a history of cheating in other classes who suddenly got every answer right on a calculus test that no one had aced in years. After the test, he couldn't show his work to explain how he got the right answer on one of the harder problems. But no one found a crib sheet.