In some ways, I'm not sure Walker cares. In fact, if he really wants to stay in Chicago, he may feel this is the best way to get that wish. If the Cubs don't trade him by April 1, his 10 team no-trade list goes into effect. Walker seems like a crafty guy. I wouldn't be surprised if his list includes the teams that would most likely want him. If the Cubs don't trade him, they are going to be on the hook for his 2.5 million. Walker is guaranteed that no matter what. Furthermore, Walker may really feel he was lied to. Yes, it's true the Cubs had other plans for second. So, why pick up the option? The Cubs created this problem, not Todd Walker. They had a number of options on how to handle it and took the worst possible road. They could have not picked up the option which would have been the smartest if they didn't want him. Walker apparently had reason to believe they would do this instead of trading him. My guess that is where the "lied" comments originated. Secondly, they could have been less open in their pursuit to replace Walker. Furthermore, they should keep their criticism of his defense in house. I can understand Walker's frustration. In fact, if I read in the paper that my boss had criticized a facet of my job performance in the paper or on the radio, I'd probably spout off a little too. And if I had something I could use to attack my supervisor's credibility, I might hint that they are less than trustworthy too.