The two most recent wins not withstanding, I still don't think this is a contending team. For that reason, I'm not in favor of trading young players for older players at this time. If we're going to make trades, we need to trade away veterans who are not part of our long term plans, particularly those not signed beyond 2006. We have a season to evaluate players like Marshall, Cedeno, Murton and others to see whether they should be part of the long term goals or whether they should be moved in the offseason to retool the team to contend in 2007 and beyond. While I agree that Tejada is signed beyond 2006 and could be helpful even if we do not contend this year, and I'll also concede that Tejada is likely to be more productive than Cedeno in 2007-2009, I'm not sure exactly what we have in Cedeno. As far as cost per marginal wins, it may be better for the Cubs to keep Cedeno and upgrade elsewhere. Cedeno will be cheap for at least the next 2-3 years, and if he can provide adequate production from his position at that price, it might be best to improve the team in other places and use the young players we have to trade for players that will do that. If the Cubs were contenders this year and were likely only one bat away from a serious run, I'd be all for the upgrade from Cedeno to Tejada and be quite willing to spend the capital of Marshal and others to get him. Since, I think the Cubs are likely a middle of the pack team with or without Tejada, I'd prefer not to spend the capital on a player when the capital might be better spent in the offseason when we will have a better picture of the player Cedeno could be.