I think what MR is trying to state is that we don't have enough information to say whether or not he's a rapist. Until the exact details of what she's accusing him of come out, we really don't know. What we do know is that she was very drunk, awoke and believed she was being assaulted, left, and filed a report some hours later. What we don't know is exactly what Starlin was doing when she woke up, what condition he was in, etc. I do not argue that if he was aware she could not consent and had sex with her any way, he's despicable and that according to the statutes is guilty of rape. I doubt that he would be prosecuted, but that is the case. However, in a case like this, at least from my limited perspective, the devil may be in the details.