I think it's a reaction to the state of flux the Hawks' net wound up in after letting Niemi get away. Not the right decision to me, but I imagine that's his reasoning. I don't think any goalie should get a big contract unless he's, I dunno, Henrik Lundqvist or Roberto Luongo (and even his deal has turned into a trainwreck). Goalies vary too much year to year based on too many things (talent of team in front of them, luck, tactical changes to penalty kills, random variance, injury, luck, and more luck) to be counted on. How many goalies are in the conversation for Vezina every single season? Lundqvist. Anyone else? Tuukka Rask will probably wind up in that conversation at some point (especially if he stays behind a Claude Julien defense). I'm struggling to think of anyone else. Carey Price has some of the best technical skill I've seen in the entire league, but he's had back to back pedestrian seasons. Braden Holtby is another guy with big technical skill and he had an awful save percentage through half the season. I think that's what's frightening. Even these guys that LOOK great have really mediocre seasons for no reason visible reason from their end. As in, there isn't an obvious reason why suddenly these goals are trickling through them as opposed to sticking in their pads or jerseys or rolling just wide. It happens to every goalie in the league except for 2 or 3 per generation. I LOVE Jon Quick, guy makes some tremendous saves. I hated his contract from day 1 (I do think he's much better than his 2013 though) and I think the Kings have made an enormous mistake in letting Bernier go to Toronto in order to let Quick be "the guy" for the next decade. That's a guy that had a season pretty similar to what Crawford just went through. I think Ken Holland said that, basically, you only pay for a top 5 goalie in the league (which really makes you wonder about signing Jimmy Howard). The gap from the 6th best goalie in the game to the 15th best goalie in the game is always marginal and the players move around all the time. Unless you're buying Dominik Hasek, you're almost better just taking a bunch of fliers on guys with raw skill (like the Hawks did with Emery which worked out really well for them). I could not agree more with both of these posts and agree with brinoch's theory. They have nobody with NHL experience behind Crawford and nobody in the pipeline. While I think the deal is too long and pricy they were kind of up [expletive] creek and felt they had to give him something because they didn't want him to have the leverage of having another solid year and being a UFA. That and look at the UFAs for the last couple years, you really want to end up with an Emery(coming into the year) or Turco type as the starter?