Magnetic Curses

i dislike kirilenko.

wow, rose.

You've obviously never been to Pearl City, IL. do you know kc randall?

they're pretty much on any $5 cable sports tier, though.

tyrus thomas sighting!

don't see it there. Try Stooge 002. And of course now that I'm watching the Bulls start to suck, LOL. you da man.

he blocks shots, too. he's definitely an athlete. Yea, I was including that in clogging the lane. He owns the lane on defense. clogging the lane sounds like what someone like tisdale does, though. stand there and take up room, haha. that was for you, ssr. yea, that was a little deceiving on my part. He just needs to work on his offense, but I'm surprised he's such a good free throw shooter. he looks like he runs the court well and gets, obviously, high percentage shots. he should go very high next year.

he blocks shots, too. he's definitely an athlete. Yea, I was including that in clogging the lane. He owns the lane on defense. clogging the lane sounds like what someone like tisdale does, though. stand there and take up room, haha. that was for you, ssr.

uconn starting to pull away now. uconn has some players, thabeet is tall as a mofo. Yea UConn looks real good. The guards are really quick both on defense and offense. wisco looks so lost against quick teams. I don't wisc very much, but their offense hasn't look as crisp as it normally does, like you said they look lost. They just took, I think, third 10 second violation. Thabeet is tall, but that is about it. All he does is clog up the lane. I think this game is over, UConn's guards are taking over. he blocks shots, too. he's definitely an athlete.

don't see it there.

Channel? fox college sports-pacific. um, sweet! :roll: what provider do you have? edit: i lied, it's also on fsn north. I'm watching it on FSN Midwest. right on.

uconn starting to pull away now. uconn has some players, thabeet is tall as a mofo. Yea UConn looks real good. The guards are really quick both on defense and offense. wisco looks so lost against quick teams.

Channel? fox college sports-pacific. um, sweet! :roll: what provider do you have? edit: i lied, it's also on fsn north.

uconn starting to pull away now. uconn has some players, thabeet is tall as a mofo.

Channel? fox college sports-pacific.

Delayed response, but it doesn't like words that start with f and also end with k. actually, i think it's "ck", as words that should get blocked don't, like "frank" as in frank caliendo. I'm gonna catch some flack for that one. EDIT: Nope. Hmmm... words that start with fu and end with ck will get blocked, i think we've figured it out.

Delayed response, but it doesn't like words that start with f and also end with k. actually, i think it's "ck", as words that should get blocked don't, like "frank" as in frank caliendo.

yung mee is a hack compared to this guy.

he hasn't deserved to be embrace yet, though. his game hasn't been good. but as far as doing the other things, he's been golden. I bet if his name was Chris Kramer you would love him, very similar games between the two yet everyone always shits all over Chester. It's not his fault he was put in the situation he was last year, that goes on Bruce and his poor recruiting. umm no Let's see Frazier averaged .8 steals a game last year in 33 minutes while Kramer averaged 2.3 in 29 minutes. Frazier might be a good defender but Kramer is ridiculously good. He not only makes people shoot bad but he gets a lot of steals. Then offensively Frazier is a liability while Kramer is someone who just doesn't shoot much (probably because he works the defense so much). Frazier has never even shot 36% in a season while Kramer's lowest is .430 his freshman year. In other words Kramer can score when needed and when left open Frazier just simply can't. So to sum up Kramer is a better shooter, defender and a much better player all around. He is also the clear team leader. Kramer is just a better athlete. I really like Kramer's game a lot. i'm going to have to come to chet's defense, here. kramer gets more steals and shoots a better percentage. however, chet is a better ball handler, distributer, and rebounder. as far as team leader, i believe that they were saying today on btn that the players call chet "coach frazier" (maybe they call kramer "mr. athletic director" at purdue, i wouldn't know). like i said, they're both role players and it's comical to say that either is "ridiculously good". haha.......hahahahaha. Read the post and don't take it out of context. Kramer is ridiculously good at defense and that is what I said. I never wrote he was ridiculously good overall. Oh and yes Frazier has more assists but his assist to turnover ratio his worse than Kramer's in their career's. The reason Kramer doesn't get a lot of assists is because everyone on Purdue can handle the ball (except the center's) so they don't have a true point guard because they don't need one. so kramer gets a pass on his lack of assist numbers but frazier doesn't get one on his shooting despite the fact that he was having to take a lot of shots playing on a team full of bad players? frazier didn't have the luxury of filling a role on last year's team. let's not make excuses for either because there are enough to go around on both sides. neither offenses require a true point guard because they're 3-guard offenses--they are the exact same motion system. like i said, both players are role players. kramer's a better shooter and gets more steals, frazier is a better ball-handler, distributer, and rebounder. i'm fine with frazier on this year's team because it's actually a good team.

he was averaging that last year, try to keep up.

he hasn't deserved to be embrace yet, though. his game hasn't been good. but as far as doing the other things, he's been golden. I bet if his name was Chris Kramer you would love him, very similar games between the two yet everyone always shits all over Chester. It's not his fault he was put in the situation he was last year, that goes on Bruce and his poor recruiting. umm no Let's see Frazier averaged .8 steals a game last year in 33 minutes while Kramer averaged 2.3 in 29 minutes. Frazier might be a good defender but Kramer is ridiculously good. He not only makes people shoot bad but he gets a lot of steals. Then offensively Frazier is a liability while Kramer is someone who just doesn't shoot much (probably because he works the defense so much). Frazier has never even shot 36% in a season while Kramer's lowest is .430 his freshman year. In other words Kramer can score when needed and when left open Frazier just simply can't. So to sum up Kramer is a better shooter, defender and a much better player all around. He is also the clear team leader. Kramer is just a better athlete. I really like Kramer's game a lot. i'm going to have to come to chet's defense, here. kramer gets more steals and shoots a better percentage. however, chet is a better ball handler, distributer, and rebounder. as far as team leader, i believe that they were saying today on btn that the players call chet "coach frazier" (maybe they call kramer "mr. athletic director" at purdue, i wouldn't know). like i said, they're both role players and it's comical to say that either is "ridiculously good". haha.......hahahahaha.

he hasn't deserved to be embrace yet, though. his game hasn't been good. but as far as doing the other things, he's been golden. I bet if his name was Chris Kramer you would love him, very similar games between the two yet everyone always shits all over Chester. It's not his fault he was put in the situation he was last year, that goes on Bruce and his poor recruiting. wait, are you telling me that i love chris kramer? when have i ever said that? Didn't mean to put words in your mouth. Just saying that the two have very similar games and do similar things for their teams. One receives praise from the schools fans for doing all the little things, while the other gets unfairly crapped all over because he isn't Dee Brown and the talent around him sucked. i think that they're both role players and they just need to do what they do well and nothing more. i think kramer has understood better up to this point in his career that he's not a scorer, though.

he hasn't deserved to be embrace yet, though. his game hasn't been good. but as far as doing the other things, he's been golden. I bet if his name was Chris Kramer you would love him, very similar games between the two yet everyone always shits all over Chester. It's not his fault he was put in the situation he was last year, that goes on Bruce and his poor recruiting. wait, are you telling me that i love chris kramer? when have i ever said that?

with mike davis, this team is actually fun to watch. i love you, mike.

he hasn't deserved to be embrace yet, though. his game hasn't been good. but as far as doing the other things besides scoring this year, he's been golden.