that's all the signs said, right? nothing about canceling the season or alleging that everyone in the football program knew about the abuse? Sooooo...he deserved it? He was asking for it? What exactly are you saying here? How do either of those things possibly justify the treatment he got? Would he have gotten the same reaction if his sign had said "put abused kids first," as theo said? Also that article is from the Washington times, which is not especially well known for its accurate reporting. I'm sure the guy took some abuse but I quite doubt it was the hours-long barrage that the reporter claims. And lastly, if you're going to make a sign that says the entire program was aware of sandusky's indiscretions, what's the problem with people waking by and calling him an [expletive]? He's exercising his freedom of speech and so are they. and the rest of us are free to judge those fucks as the fucks they are.