Jeremy Giambi effect. Google it. If you want to make excuses for Murton, based on playing time then you have to consider that same variable for all of the OF'ers on the current roster. Wow, just imagine how good Floyd would be if he played everyday. Or, think about Jacque Jones repeating his season last year, if only they let him start in RF every game again. You do realize that these are not 'facts', right? These are perceptions, abstracts that you have created in your mind that really have little evidence to support them beyond your insistence that they do, in fact, exist. Next you're going to tell me that he doesn't have 'intangibles', or he isn't 'clutch'. Now your concerned about what are facts? I thought you were arguing the "Jeremy Giambi" effect. What part of his .697 OPS, does not show that he has no power? If you don't think Matt Murton has made too many mental mistakes or that he been a terrible defender this year, you are either: 1. His brother/sister (or other relative); or 2. Haven't watched a game on TV this year (which is understandable with the way they are playing); or 3. Just started watching baseball this year and don't understand what is the widely accepted useage of the term "mental mistakes". For someone hung up on definitions, your definition nof "pretty decent" is extremely broad. A .697 OPS from a RF/LF is not "pretty decent." Murton ranks 58th this year in NL OF OPS. Murton is not even adequate with that OPS. If you weren't so tied up in making cute analogies, you might have some understanding of what you're talking about, and how wrong you are. Murton has 109 at-bats this season. He has 595 prior to this year, in which he hit at a much better pace. What's pretty "broad" is your assessment of Murton as an overall player based only on those 109 at-bats. Moreover...you know, I just reread ahead. I give up. Your method of argumentation is so childish it's really not worth bothering with.