And I'm not saying, never have been saying, that there aren't good reasons to think that the Cubs likely will not make the playoffs. All I'm saying is that there are reasons to think that they still could and those need to be factored in if you are going to argue that your point-of-view is well-balanced. To say that the season is over, hands down, no doubt, the Cubs suck and will continue to suck like you and so many others were just a couple of pages ago is quite different than saying what you just said. And I'm not sure how you could possibly know what record the Cubs are going to have to have in order to win the wild card. That "statement of fact" certainly is an opinion. You know what, the Cubs could get ridiculously lucky. And that would be great. they could leap over 6 teams in unprecedented fashion. Their players could all go on hot streaks. They could not even have to go 36-16 and win 90 games, which, by the way, is the least a team has ever had to win in order to get the wild-card (by the Cubs, in 1998, and LA, in 1996). They could have Maddux suddenly not realize how old he is, or Rich Hill pull a Dontrelle Willis for the rest of the year. But, barring complete miracles, it ain't gonna happen. My point of view, that the Cubs have virtually no chance at making the playoffs, is about the most rational, easily factually supported thing you can come up with. The final idea, that the Cubs cannot be a playoff team, is still an opinion, which is fine with me, because it'll be backed up with the fact that they don't make the playoffs later on. Please continue your insipid "fact vs. opinion" argument, as I am obviously unable to determine what is fact and what is opinion, and certainly the FACT that my OPINION is very easily supported makes it completely unacceptable.