One thing about this team that is not yet at the level of a concern but is a consideration is 2026 payroll. As currently structured, Bellinger has a likely opt out, Shota has an unlikely opt out, and no one else is slated to hit free agency.
If the team trades for and extends Tucker, they basically need the rest of this offseason's acquisitions to be 1 year deals, otherwise next winter is going to REAL slow. Think like the 2019/2020 offseason. "We can't do anything unless we deal Taillon and Hoerner" will be the new "We can't do anything unless we deal KB".
Adding Cease on top of Tucker accomplishes a few things. First off, he's straight up the best SP left on the market. Second, because he is a similar caliber of star on a one-year deal, he can serve as a hedge against Tucker leaving. Plan A would be to obviously extend Tucker, but if he is of a similar mind to Soto a year ago there's now an ability to pivot and throw ~$200M at locking down Cease instead. Either way you clear out some of the Iowa prospect depth, make this team downright scary in 2025 (and still looking good heading into '26), and have an extra draft pick heading your way after the season.
Back to the premise of your article and less my tangentially related pontificaing, if you do choose to send Suzuki back to San Diego in a Cease deal it largely undoes everything I said above. The marginal increase in '26 salary from Suzuki to Cease is likely to be under $10M. So while I would MUCH prefer the version of a Cease deal built on prospects, there is some merit to the Suzuki path.