Bertz
Old-Timey Member-
Posts
12,656 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Bertz
-
I thought this was an interesting read. I like the idea of visualizing reliever usage like this. It'll be interesting to watch Counsell with a hopefully effective bullpen this year. I tend to think from watching him with the Brewers he's a top right guy. Fans on the other hand tend to want more of that Marlins' strategy.
-
Looking through Jim Callis' feed I don't see him saying it anywhere, but they're usually not far behind the Top 100. I'd assume the next week or so.
-
My guess, assuming we're not getting a bunch of outright lies, is this is the state of play: - Something about the Astros offer sucks. Deferrals, a vesting option. something like that. Bregman wants to go back so decent chance this works still - The Tigers offer is decent. Probably on the low end of what Bregman would take, but he doesn't want to go to Detroit so he's hoping someone else steps up - Cubs are offering something Bellinger-esque - Red Sox are offering something stupid. 4/100 with no options or something like that. They're going to get a "we tried" out of this - Mets haven't seriously engaged, but are interested until Alonso inevitably re-signs And thus we wait for someone to step up or Bregman to take Detroit's money.
- 470 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- alex bregman
- matt shaw
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
It's very funny to me that all of the local folks are like "yeah they want him but only on their terms don't get too excited, it's probably not gonna happen." At the same time all of the less...scrupulous...national writers are pushing this HARD.
- 470 replies
-
- alex bregman
- matt shaw
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I don't understand why these minor league guys keep signing here. From the team's POV, whatever. There's little to no cost and you have Spring Training to see if anybody makes some changes that pop off the page. From the player's POV, has no one looked at a depth chart? There is enough talk about the Cubs and free agent relievers that you can pencil in the Cubs adding another late inning option. Let's call it Robertson so I have a real name and not a placeholder. The Cubs' MLB bullpen will thus look like this heading into ST: CL - Pressly SU - Hodge*, Robertson, Pearson MR - Morgan*, Merryweather Matchup Guys - Miller, Thielbar Hodge and Morgan with the * are the only two guys with minor league options. Both look exceedingly unlikely to open the year in the minors. That's fine though, there are always injuries, right? But these are the guys already eying a spot at Iowa wanting to be that next man up. I have to separate them into three categories because there are so many: On the 40 man, no MiLB options: Keegan Thompson, Rob Zastryzny, On the 40 man, has MiLB options: Palencia, Little, Neely, Kilian, Hollowell Not on the 40 man: Phil Bickford, Trevor Richards, Brooks Kriske, Ben Heller, Brad Keller, Brandon Hughes Then you have the starters! If Assad or Brown or Horton come up sans injury it pushes Rea to the pen, which kills another spot. If you're a Brad Keller type and your career is hanging by a thread, I don't know why you wouldn't go to like the White Sox or something where you can actually count the number of guys you have to pass on the depth chart on your fingers. Or is this a compliment to Hottovy: these guys are coming here hoping to get fixed and go somewhere else in April?
-
Have to assume this is the Tigers and this saga is about over
-
The Cubs Are "One Team To Watch" In Dylan Cease Sweepstakes
Bertz replied to Matthew Lenz's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
I do want Cease dealt even if it's not here. The Cubs' April schedule is so damn brutal, and part of that is facing the Padres twice. Even though in an objective sense Cease going to the Mets is lateral for us, punting an extra hard game or two to later in the year would be nice. -
He's not as good of a roster fit after Berti but I still would have liked.
-
The Cubs Are "One Team To Watch" In Dylan Cease Sweepstakes
Bertz replied to Matthew Lenz's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Yeah I think I've been as guilty of insisting "the Cubs have got to trade something" as anybody over the last 6 months. But the Paredes trade opening up a full time spot for Shaw and finding out that Alcantara has another option year in 2026 kills much of that urgency. I would like the Cubs to make a big trade now. But spending the rest of the offseason funds on boring stuff and heading into the trade deadline with a tall stack of chips is A Okay. -
The Cubs Are "One Team To Watch" In Dylan Cease Sweepstakes
Bertz replied to Matthew Lenz's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Yeah for the Cubs it's closer to 75 usually -
The Cubs Are "One Team To Watch" In Dylan Cease Sweepstakes
Bertz replied to Matthew Lenz's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Circling back to this. The Dylan Cease trade last year was for Drew Thorpe - A very good SP prospect at AA who made the back half of most of the offseason Top 100s Jairo Iriarte - A good SP prospect at AA for whom opinions diverged a bit more than Thorpe. Fangraphs 100'd him while MLB didn't for instance Samuel Zavala - A LatAm bonus baby who performed very well in Low A as an 18 year old Steve Wilson - A young RP with good stuff, a good ERA, and trash peripherals This isnt perfect, but the equivalent from us right now would be something like Horton, Birdsell, Jefferson Rojas, and Keegan Thompson? And that was for two years of Cease, not 1. So honestly, I'm not even sure a Caissie or Alcantara should be in bounds, especially if we're taking back Suarez. Assad, Wicks, and Preller's favorite non-Hodge reliever might be more appropriate. And he can address LF with the $$ he saves. -
The Cubs Are "One Team To Watch" In Dylan Cease Sweepstakes
Bertz replied to Matthew Lenz's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
On the prospect depth piece, it's also worth noting the pre-arb players that don't show up on prospect lists 0-1 year service: PCA, Brown, Hodge 1-2 year service: Amaya, Busch. Wicks 2-3 years service: Assad That's on top of the 4 hitters (Alcantara, Cassie, Triantos, Ballesteros) at Iowa who've shown up on a Top 100 list over the last week. Plus Horton and Birdsell. Plus the complimentary bench/bullpen types. You don't want to recklessly burn through this list but you can comfortably dip into it 2-3 times over the next 12-18 months IMO. -
The Cubs Are "One Team To Watch" In Dylan Cease Sweepstakes
Bertz replied to Matthew Lenz's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Rental pitchers don't generally net anything close to that because of pitcher attrition. Hell just look at Cease specifically. Last spring two years of Dylan Cease didn't return a headliner anywhere near the caliber of Shaw, it certainly wouldn't now. -
I'd consider Caissie a much better roster fit for the Padres than Alcantara - Jackson Merrill was great in CF last year so the coverage there is a pure nice to have - The Padres are also bad at whichever of 1B/DH Arraez isn't playing on a given day. Arraez may not be long for the org on top of that - When you look at their lineup it doesn't feel like it *needs* a lefty, but from last year the prominent departures in LF are Jurickson Profar (switch) and David Peralta (lefty) so you'd assume they'd prefer a lefty backfill. Especially since Eguy Rosario appears ready to step into a bigger role from the right hand side All that being said, in this situation I think you take the player you like more since a year from now those roster considerations may be wildly different. But in my mind's eye I see Caissie and two SPs, and the real haggling is over which SPs.
-
Sample sizes are obviously tiny, but Brown didn't have a TTO penalty last year. He also only faced three teams twice: two of those he pitched a strong game the second time and the 3rd, against the Reds, was his last game before his season ending injury (so it buddies the causation). I'm not going to make major declarations off of 55 innings, but I don't think we've seen anything from a performance standpoint that says he can't be a SP. If you want to throw in the towel early off of durability that's fine, but also IMO feels premature. The other thing is that he is CLEARLY our best young pitchers on a per inning basis right now. It's not close. Given the number of young SPs the Cubs have, and the Cubs market status allowing them to pay market rate for guys like Taillon and Boyd, you have to prioritize the potential star power of Brown (and Horton) when considering some sort of assett consolidation deal. Even if Brown and Assad for instance have the same expected value, a team in the Cubs' position should prioritize Brown's vastly superior 80th+ percentile outcomes.
-
Keith Law ranked the Cubs as having the #6 farm system, which IMO feels a bit rich. Law's rankings have always been focused on the top tier of the system though. So it is consistent for him to love the farm right now after having been comparatively light on it the past few years.
-
Didn't actually read the full Levine article until just now, so completely missed this I would love Jorge Polanco. You'd assume this means Moncada is still on the table as well. Also implies Brujan probably shouldn't be in too big a hurry to find a place to live in Chicago.
-
The Athletic: Cubs looking to be "Opportunistic"
Bertz replied to Bertz's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Bregman’s not much (any?) better than Hoerner. He's more offensively inclined but not really better. If you do the Nico/Bregman swap the benefits are - The lineup fits together way more nicely - You presumably get something substantial back for Hoerner - Nico is part of the "cliff" after 2026. Happ, Nico, Seiya, Taillon, and Boyd all hit FA. Not all of those guys are tough replacements, but there's something to be said about that much turnover all at once regardless of impact. Bregman would presumably be on a 3 year deal with an opt out after 1, so swapping him in for Nico smooths out some of that roster churn -
Man he must really not want to go to Detroit.
-
I'm guessing it's tied to velo. There was a note in, I believe the Athletic, about how the Cubs felt they could get a little more velo out of him. I also saw someone, Brendan Miller maybe, noted that his velo was kind of all over the place last year. Like he was down a full MPH for the year but he had a lot of outings where he was still sitting 95.
-
The Athletic: Cubs looking to be "Opportunistic"
Bertz replied to Bertz's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
I think my preference from where we go here is in this order: 1. Get something done with the Padres. A 3rd playoff caliber SP is basically the only remaining way to significantly juice this roster's win total, and we have some depth to deal from at Iowa. I have zero reservations about having two primo rental players. None. 2. Sign the best complimentary players you can to round out the roster. Can you get Robertson/Canha/Laureano for $25M? I think it's close! Even if you only want to spend $20M and push a bit more money to July you could sign two and skimp on the 3rd (e.g. swap in Stanek for Robertson). 3. Sign Bregman/Flaherty/Alonso - I don't expect these guys to get a 1 year deal, and I'm VERY nervous about adding a potential multi-year deal at $20M+ per year. That basically locks in that in order to extend Tucker Tom needs to raise payroll or Jed needs to move a significant salary. I do not like signing up for that a year in advance. I still vividly remember "Don't worry, we just need to trade Bryant to the Braves and then we can start our offseason." -
Over the last 3 years Statcast has him as a -5 defender at 3B over roughly half a season. I don't think you could count on him to get more than occasional time at 3rd. Similar to Patrick Wisdom last year, you'll be able to count on your fingers and toes the number of times he can play over there without it being a problem. I like Turner too, I think he's a good fit on the roster (I like him a smidge less than Canha), but we should just be clear eyed that he'd be primarily a 1B/DH.
-
Kiley McDaniel 23 - Matt Shaw 50 - Moises Ballesteros 64 - Kevin Alcantara 86 - Owen Caissie 97 - Cade Horton Zyhir Hope was 70, Cam Smith 73, Jackson Ferris 93
-
While there is always room for potential improvement, after adding Ryan Pressly and Jon Berti over the last week the Cubs' roster is looking reasonably complete. Jed Hoyer's offseason appears far from done however. The Cubs currently sit approximately $34M below the first Luxury Tax level according to Roster Resource, and Tom Ricketts confirmed he expects payroll to end up in that vicinity. Even if the team views the Luxury Tax line as a hard (self imposed) cap, they can add as much as $25M in salary and still leave buffer for mid-season maneuvering. According to a staff report from The Athletic, the Cubs are trying to take full advantage of their current position in the market: This would likely explain why rumors are all over the place right now. The team has been tied to Alex Bregman, David Robertson, and Michael King just in the short time since the Ryan Pressly trade was completed. With the aforementioned payroll flexibility as well as seven players on MLB Pipeline's recent Top 100 Prospect lists, the Cubs can plausibly land any player currently available. So expect additional moves from here, and whether it's genuine interest or another party trying to drum up leverage expect to see the Cubs included in a variety of rumors as well. View full rumor
-
While there is always room for potential improvement, after adding Ryan Pressly and Jon Berti over the last week the Cubs' roster is looking reasonably complete. Jed Hoyer's offseason appears far from done however. The Cubs currently sit approximately $34M below the first Luxury Tax level according to Roster Resource, and Tom Ricketts confirmed he expects payroll to end up in that vicinity. Even if the team views the Luxury Tax line as a hard (self imposed) cap, they can add as much as $25M in salary and still leave buffer for mid-season maneuvering. According to a staff report from The Athletic, the Cubs are trying to take full advantage of their current position in the market: This would likely explain why rumors are all over the place right now. The team has been tied to Alex Bregman, David Robertson, and Michael King just in the short time since the Ryan Pressly trade was completed. With the aforementioned payroll flexibility as well as seven players on MLB Pipeline's recent Top 100 Prospect lists, the Cubs can plausibly land any player currently available. So expect additional moves from here, and whether it's genuine interest or another party trying to drum up leverage expect to see the Cubs included in a variety of rumors as well.

