Jump to content
North Side Baseball

javy knows my name

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    10,333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by javy knows my name

  1. Are you trying to tell us something that we don't already know here? Look, this is really simple: there is way too much emotion going on in all of your posts. No one is happy that Hill's control has disappeared, and no one knows why it happened. Even if there were a meaningful discussion to be had here (and there isn't), it wouldn't happen because of the nature and tone of your posts. People here don't respond well to these petulant, emotionally charged posts under any circumstances, really. And frankly, the only posts that make the thread readable are the sarcastic ones. You are right when you talk about the vets on this board and the difficulty of getting a post/thread accepted by them. The majority of their posts are probably shots at uninformed and tactless posters cluttering the board, but you'll notice that when any of them start a thread,* they normally make a substantive claim that induces discussion. The "noobs" and the emotionally-driven tend to treat starting a new thread like another post, and forget the substance and hurt any chance of a real discussion. Once you begin starting threads with stats-based claims and relevant information, things will get better for you. *with the exception of maybe IMB. But 90% of them are funny.
  2. Very nice. This sounds like something Woody Allen would say.
  3. NOOO. Jesus, NO. It's NOT. At all!
  4. Guesses as to how many pages this thread gets to by Monday?
  5. Total hyperbole
  6. This thread is too funny. I'm eagerly awaiting Badnews' return
  7. They'll get their fair share of awesome teams for at least the next five years, so I sort of agree with this.
  8. If this place wants to be serious about enforcing board guidelines then this guy should be gone for this post
  9. Seriously...it's time for Lou to own this. He's setting the guy up for failure in big spots, what does he expect? Stick him in center and bat him eighth, where his production will be only slightly below average.
  10. Word. Those guys are getting adopted by me this year
  11. Sometimes I think everyone has me on ignore
  12. Sort of. It would be akin to the 10mm they spent on Yankee Stadium in the 70s - it would only delay the inevitable. Also it sounds like the main problem with the player facilities is a lack of space. A new coat of paint and some tvs isn't going to do much to change that, IMO. Also, IMO, those who are rooting for Cuban to buy the Cubs (like me) are also essentially rooting for a new stadium to be built sooner rather than later. We all know that Cuban likes to take care of his players. I'd be fine with this as I think the franchise would be better off they separated themselves from the whiny beotches in Wrigleyville and played more damn night games. Plus it would amuse me to watch property values in Lakeview plummet. Thoughts?
  13. Who on this board didn't expect a bit of a letdown today?
  14. There aren't that many vowels in there to begin with; don't take more out!
  15. I only go there when I want to discover a new virus to put on my computer.
  16. Yikes. New guy has 18 posts and half of them are defending pitcher W/L record. Also, maybe I read this wrong, but it sounded like you were addressing the Blyleven comment as if his win total was an overestimation of his abilities. It is, of course, a gross underestimation because the man played on some of the worst teams in baseball for the majority of his career and all that's keeping him out of the HOF is his inability to reach a completely arbitrary number of a meaningless counting stat.
  17. bert blyleven wanted me to tell you that wins are meaningless
  18. On SportsCenter today. He, Steve Phillips and Ravech's BBTN successor (can't remember the name) are discussing NL Cy Young candidates. The conversation spirals into Kruk arguing that if Webb wins his next four starts, he should get the nod with what would be 23 wins. I'll paraphrase from here: Ravech jr: But John, you can't give it to him solely based on wins; it's a team stat John Kruk: Yeah but ALL stats are team stats! MVP is a team stat! RBIs are a team stat- RJ (interrupting Kruk): But what about on base percentage and slugging- Kruk (shouting): THEY ALL DEPEND ON THE TEAM AROUND THEM! RBI IS A TEAM STAT BECAUSE NO ONE CAN CONTROL WHO GETS ON BASE IN FRONT OF THEM! They shout at each other for a little while and it became unintelligible. Kruk gets in the last word by rolling his eyes and calling RJ "Mr. Sabermetrician." I had always suspected that Ravech knew a ton more about baseball than either of those knuckleheads and it seems the new guy is no different. The moral of this story is that John Kruk is stupid.
  19. maybe 70, honestly. a 120 pound closer with a violent delivery and numbers trending the wrong way? where do i sign? I would agree with the 7 not 70...The guys numbers might be getting worse, but getting 55 saves means your doing something right. not to the tune of 15mm per, it doesn't
  20. .MasterBlaster, meet Eriklettersandnumbers and please don't hold him against us
  21. Angels. That wasn't hard. That's what she said.
×
×
  • Create New...