Jump to content
North Side Baseball

WrigleyField 22

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    19,067
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by WrigleyField 22

  1. Also Cracker Jack and PBR. But more generally than the two buildings and parks that still stand, it had further reaching influence of city planning in Chicago that occurred afterwards. It wasn't just an event in its own but ushered a greater movement, not to mention what it did for putting Chicago on the map.
  2. The World's Fair? Yea, and the planning/implementing of it went a lot like Rio now.
  3. Yea conspiracy is definitely a bit much, but the deck was stacked and the technicality of the bids didn't mean much. That being said, pro Rio was a big part of it, not just anti-American sentiment. Whoever the other two cities were didn't stand much of a chance either, they were just saved the embarrassment of a first round exit. No one would cry conspiracy if Chicago didn't get humiliated.
  4. Chicago already had their version of the Olympics and we're still benefitting from much of it over a hundred years later, so I'm okay missing the headache of a current Olympic Games, despite how once in a lifetime experience it would have been, and any of the upgraded amenities it would have meant.
  5. The problem with open is that the IOC rules required a certain amount that's covered for dignitaries. That and it had capacity issues. That was a big reason for the semi-temporary Olympic stadium in Washington Park. That was actually helpful to Chicago's technical bid, but that of course didn't matter. The only serious permanent structures was going to be the Olympic village.
  6. Bayless is certainly good at his job.
  7. Yea at his age they may not even be really treating the prostate cancer, just monitoring it. He may be more likely to just die of old age first (obviously it depends, but it wouldn't be uncommon).
  8. Not only did the big three take a cut knowing each were in, but did do to bring along another basically hand picked guy in Miller. If Miller isn't available, it's possible they all still take their max.
  9. Yea if the Lakers want to part with that pick they can get actual players in exchange. And I see no way Chicago lets Thibs go, so I'm guessing they don't grant permission. This isn't a Doc situation.
  10. My first TV crush was the pink power ranger
  11. Broncos select Kieth McGill, CB, Utah Sent from my Lenovo S5000-F using Tapatalk
  12. Can you deconstruct that sentence for me? We have some additional second rounders (from Portland via the Deng trade) we can use to trade up from our current second round spot, similar to the move we made to get Asik, in which we traded our second rounder and two future second rounders.
  13. We also have some future seconds now we can trade if we want like we did with Asik.
  14. It's gotta be Buccannon. I'm not worried about doubling down, but I think Buccannon has more value here than the DL available.
  15. Ravens select Cameron Fleming, OT Stanford Sent from my Lenovo S5000-F using Tapatalk
  16. I am really confused...to me, his girlfriend looks like an asian/black mix? Mexican/Black apparently.
  17. I think need wise CB, ILB, and RB are all in play here. Based on what's available I'm gonna get that first RB off the board. I'm sure Browns fans would want the Ohio State guy but I'm going Bishop Sankey, RB, Washington. Should form a good duo with Tate and continue to build around Gordon and the first two picks. With plenty more picks, defensive depth will wait. Pm'd cubbyvirus
  18. Not true. If you zoom in enough and know your suburban geography, you'll see they basically show I-88/290 as the dividing line between fandoms, with the exception being The Naperville/Lisle/Woodridge/Bolingbrook areas shown as predominantly Cubs fans. This makes more sense as there are not more Sox fans in the Chicago area than Cubs fans. Yea it seems pretty accurate to me. I viewed it on my phone so it was a little difficult to pick everything out, but was there a pocket of cubs strength in Hyde Park?
  19. I'm not sure how I feel about Hageman but I think I'd take that draft, raw.
  20. Also regarding visits it seems possible that guy isn't distinguishing between private visits and combine/pro day visits (he has 32 listed and the max is 30) . But it's obviously a guessing game and they may choose to leak certain pre draft visits and conceal others.
  21. Pretty good review. I would contend some of the classifications (or at least contend their predictive value), but it at the very least gives a good overview.
  22. So I've been trying to research the Bears pre draft visits to get an idea who they may draft. In Emery's first two drafts there was pretty strong correlation. So a few notes- We're drafting a safety in the first two rounds. Dix, Pryor, Fuller, and Bucannon all have had official visits. Credit to a RealGM poster , but Bucannon probably has the best measurables, so don't be surprised if he's the guy, even in round one (it wouldn't be an Emery draft if round one didn't feel like a big reach). Don't be surprised if we pass on Donald (though I think he may be gone anyways). We did meet with him at the combine, but no official Halas Hall visit as far as i can see. One DL to visit was Nix who could certainly fit in a hybrid or straight 3-4 scheme. Donald makes tons of sense for a true Tampa 2 team. He's also small and save for the McClellin pick, Emery seems to like size too, and has talked about valuing it more. They may be looking for versatility. Both are late day 3 prospects (or even UDFA), but both De'Anthony Thomas and Jordan Lynch had official visits. Will be interesting to see if Emery takes a risk on a potential big play athlete without a position and let Trestman figure out the rest. Both these guys could possibly line up in the backfield, but neither would be a true runner, and also line up as WR. With only Ford and Draugh behind Forte one more body would be wise, so it will be interesting to see if or how Emery addresses RB in the draft. With our defensive FA signings I wouldn't even mind a true RB in rd 2 or 3 though I can't find any word of visits, so no signs we plan to address RB early. Obviously the pre draft visits are only one thing to go on, but basically the only insight we have now. Any significant visits I'm missing?
  23. Confirmed Shazier. At this rate well have time for 3 rounds
  24. Pretty sure I signed up for Broncos but I'm up for suggestions. I'm thinking Ryan Shazier, LB Ohio State
×
×
  • Create New...