Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Transmogrified Tiger

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    38,769
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    70

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Transmogrified Tiger

  1. Is that 12 player trade for real? How did the Mariners get away with that?
  2. He can't leave, how else is Towers going to get back to San Diego?
  3. With Johnson around, and Pie not showing up in the recent Peavy rumors, I don't think we're in much need for a backup OF.
  4. Where did Hermida come from? And who is better ... Hermida or Bradley? Hermida can actually play for us and not just sit on the DL . . . so Hermida. Teach me about Hermida, I feel like I'm missing something. He had a great year in 07, his first full year, but was pretty awful last year. His slugging and OBP took a big hit. Was there a reason for that, or are we just hoping to buy low and hope he returns to form? Hits well away from his home pitchers park, still very young, outstanding minor league track record. The fact that he was down a bit last year means he'll just come a little cheaper hopefully.
  5. I only saw the last 5 minutes, but Curry was unbelievable. His release is lightning quick.
  6. Yikes. You'd think the manager with the "power pitching" fetish would be happy to see Marshall go in exchange for Peavy. it kind of pisses me off that lou tries to act like the gm so much. "i want this"... "no wait... i want this".... "wait, i want that other thing again". just let jim do his job Stop believing everything you read.
  7. If that's what it takes to insert Marquis in a trade for someone instead of Marshall, it's a sacrifice I'm gladly willing to make. I'd much rather indirectly pay Marshall 4 million than Marquis 9 million.
  8. speaking of victims, i think we just intercepted chase daniel again It's all slant routes and bubble screens, it's not that hard to figure out.
  9. I'd be looking forward to Florida losing so much more if Oklahoma would stop pretending to be victims before every single game they play. I think Bob Stoops must scour ESPN message boards for "OU sucks" posts and then tell the media about how they're playing with a chip on the shoulder because they, OKLAHOMA, aren't getting respect.
  10. Paraphrasing... "cue Redflash saying they didn't want Gordon anyway" "Sorry truffle, but here's three paragraphs why Gordon probably wasn't good enough for Bama anyways"
  11. Most places where you find statistics that would require explanation(Baseball Reference, Hardball Times, Fangraphs, etc.) have glossary pages on their site.
  12. Signing Bradley to a 3/25 deal does not in any way mortgage the future. There's no real incumbent at the position he plays, and the years and dollars aren't prohibitive. There's definitely trepidation for paying the money that Peavy's owed, but it's a necessity to add a player of his caliber. Four year deals might be suicide if you're dealing with Carlos Silva(or maybe Ryan Dempster, but that's a different topic and water under the bridge), but if you want the best talent it's the risk you have to take. Being overly fearful of getting burned on a contract for a player like Jake Peavy is how you end up like the Cardinals, filling half your rotation with recycled options every year and not being able to compete with those who go out and get real talent.
  13. Every Bowl Game in 10 words (NSFW language) A couple of my favorites: Capital One Bowl: Dantonio suspends EVERYONE for not wearing top hats. LOSS, Spartans. Rose Bowl: JoePa says “I haven’t seen that much blood since Antietam.”
  14. DeRosa, Marquis, Pie, Hill, Vitters, Cedeno, and 4 million for Peavy. Oh, is that all? edit: And Pie + Marquis at 5M for Olson? hahaha
  15. Will Rhymes could fit that bill. This year was the only year he's had a platoon split instead of a reverse platoon split though, and he's only average defensively and only at 2B. Daniel Mayora is an even better fit, but he's never played an inning above High A.
  16. Aurilia was a couple runs below average at 3rd, so he'd probably be something similar at 2nd. Not a positive, but not too much to be worried about in the v. LHP side of a platoon, especially with Fontenot able to be a defensive replacement.
  17. I don't think it's too much to ask that we keep one of DeRosa, Pie, and Marshall.
  18. Someone in the Mark Loretta, Ray Durham, Alex Cintron category, I would assume. I've said it a couple places now, but Clint Barmes is my guy for that spot. Good defender that has always hit LHP, in an overcrowded infield situation in Colorado with Atkins, Baker, Stewart, and Tulowitzki all competing for 3 spots.
  19. From Winter 08-09: http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports_hardball/2008/12/cubs-close-to-a.html Let's not pen Peavy into our rotation just yet. The key difference here is that Baltimore's owner was doing everything possible to keep Roberts from being traded, while San Diego's owner is putting payroll restrictions on Towers that force him to be traded. And the Cubs are the only trade possibility.
  20. It also makes it less likely that Pie is in the deal. Bradley, Fukudome, Johnson, and Pie for 2 OF spots would be fine. Tangentially, I'm really bad at making comparisons based in runs. Can someone give me a triple slash line that's approximately 10 runs worse than .290/.375/.480? 20 runs? 30 runs?
  21. I might be remembering a different team, but I'm pretty sure Minnesota was like Vanderbilt, walking a tightrope(similar total yardage, really advantageous turnovers) to win games early against mediocre teams, then that luck ran out and they got smashed by everyone the rest of the year. As long as KU doesn't do anything really dumb in this game they should win by a couple scores.
  22. Everett has started about 100 games the last two years combined, his defense is way down(though still well above average) from his injuries, he's always been a disaster at the plate, and he'll be 32 years old come spring training. There's not a lot of upside to adding him, although at a year and a million there's no real harm unless you're under really tight budgetary restrictions.
  23. Not a fan of his at all. Not a very good K/9, rather high H/9, and outside of 2007, he's shown a tendency to give up the longball. He's more BABIP dependent because of his lower K rate, but he's been fine with HR rate aside from when he got hurt in '05. I'm not suggesting he be a staple of the bullpen, but we could probably do worse than bringing him in for a year to be a middle reliever.
×
×
  • Create New...