Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Transmogrified Tiger

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    38,761
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    70

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Transmogrified Tiger

  1. For anyone else like me who stared at that for minutes wondering what was off.
  2. Especially in the playoffs, it's baffling that they just don't play the full period, or shorten it to 10 minutes and play the full period.
  3. Is there an article that's talked about this? Curious to read more. Rather than a full length article, it's just been referenced in a couple of fangraphs pieces over the offseason. Can't remember which ones in particular, though. Any players that you remember? I just went back 3 years and the only SP I could find was Nicasio.
  4. Is there an article that's talked about this? Curious to read more.
  5. Admittedly I only eyeballed his MLB experience and took his DFA as proof he was out of options, but if he does have one left then that's great. brett and bruce miles refer to sending him to AAA while other outlets prior to the deal talked about him as a guy w/o options. presumably they DFA'd him for 40 man reasons, when the Rockies acquired Holland. Sharma says he has an option too, awesome. Love this move in that light.
  6. others are referring to him as a guy they can shuttle back and forth. Admittedly I only eyeballed his MLB experience and took his DFA as proof he was out of options, but if he does have one left then that's great.
  7. I was thinking about this when double checking his repertoire. He'd probably sit 95-96 out of the pen and throws a slider, plus he hasn't had huge strike throwing problems. On the other hand, he can't get anyone to swing and miss, and the pen is already super crowded with Davis, Rondon, Strop, Uehara, Edwards, Grimm, Montgomery/Anderson, & Duensing/Zastryzny/Smith.
  8. Not optionable, but that'll work for a 7th starter. Especially since he stands a fair chance of being able to be outrighted if he doesn't show big improvement in ST.
  9. http://www.stltoday.com/sports/baseball/professional/mlb-hammers-cardinals-first-two-draft-picks-million-go-to/article_bfe37c71-a48c-57be-98ed-1c5dec2eee93.html Those two picks are number 56 and 75 because they lost their first rounder for Fowler, so they're basically going to have a draft like the Cubs did in 2016 where they don't pick in the Top 100.
  10. I forget the rules; if we give the Yankees some compensation, Smith can start the season in the Cubs' minor league system? That seems too easy.. We basically have to trade for Smith to be able to option him. The cost isn't likely to be high, but there's no formal mechanism that the Yankees are powerless against, so if they love Smith they don't have to agree to it and could wait for the Cubs to return him.
  11. Serbia friendly at halftime. Nagbe looks very good, Bedoya continues to be nondescript even though there's options like Morris who play that exact position in the 18, Marshall doesn't look as good as he does for club, Garza was lucky not to give up a PK, and I wish we had a more ascendent replacement for Jones. Are we really going to start Lletget in a crucial WCQ? Eventually there's hope Roldan grows into that role but it's hard to see that happening this cycle.
  12. Castro had a carrying hit tool, while Torres doesn't really standout anywhere. He doesn't make a ton of contact, hit for a high average, show tremendous plate discipline, hit for significant power, or play terrific defense. Castro's peak as a prospect also came after he hit .367/.413/.560 in AA and got promoted to Chicago. I don't think his wording really implies that. Just the hopes and dreams of a top 5 prospect (in all of baseball). Correct, there's a significant gap between one of the top 5 players in baseball and a guy who is not likely to be one of the 5 best players on a good team. Top 5 prospects in baseball shouldn't be the latter.
  13. There's still more than a few evaluators that see Torres as a future 2B, any comparison between him and Russell starts with him way in the hole on defense alone. He also doesn't have Russell's power, makes only a smidge more contact, and doesn't hit for a better average than Russell.
  14. He's a very good prospect, but you're basically hoping and praying he becomes Placido Polanco. That's no insult, Polanco was very good for a number of years, but that's not the hopes and dreams of someone in the Top 5 of all of baseball. He's high risk of being a second baseman, he had a .775 OPS at High A, and his K rate is high for someone who isn't going to slug like someone like Russell. You don't even really need something to collapse for Torres to be a non-descript major leaguer, just the attrition of his production at the 2 levels he needs to ascend through would do it.
  15. Why in the world are the ceiling fetishists that make prospect lists putting Gleyber Torres in the Top 5?
  16. *2015 Cubs have 4 starters with 31+ starts* well the Cubs got lucky with pitcher health, let's see what happens when *2016 Cubs have 5 pitchers with 29+ starts* okay that's lucky too and if they get hit with injuries then they'll feel the pain
  17. Definitely not, Montgomery has to explicitly fail out of the rotation. Otherwise as things stand you're signing yourself up for having 2 incumbent SP after '17 with the benefit being that Anderson is hopefully a small bit better and doesn't have his arm fall off. I hate to say it, but I'd rather see Montgomery in the pen for the first month or two. He's maxed out around 150 IP in the minors, and only threw 100 IP last year. I'd rather he not be gassed at the end of the season when things actually matter -- it's not like we're projected to actually need him to win the division outright. Give Anderson the 5th SP gig out of spring training. Let him start while he's healthy. If by some miracle all of our starters are still healthy and effective when Montgomery is ready to transition back to starting, we can explore using a six man rotation or trading Anderson. I'm not super worried on that front, but if that's a concern, then just go to a 6 man rotation right away. You'll still have 7 relievers in the pen and everyone wins. Anderson gets to pitch without an injury elsewhere, and Montgomery gets his workload managed.
  18. If Anderson shows he's healthy in ST I'm fine with him being the 5th starter and Monty starting the year in the pen Definitely not, Montgomery has to explicitly fail out of the rotation. Otherwise as things stand you're signing yourself up for having 2 incumbent SP after '17 with the benefit being that Anderson is hopefully a small bit better and doesn't have his arm fall off.
  19. Makes more sense than Ross, I'm down with this. Also, sucks to be the rule 5 so and so, he's gotta hope a reliever dies in ST now.
  20. Friedman's gonna make the most efficient 88 win team you ever saw
  21. Came to post the same. How is that not a safety or at least down at the one? I don't know the exact wording, but I'm pretty sure the rules are written to be pretty lenient on recoveries that carry you into the end zone. On one of the replays it looked like one of the defender's legs was already in the end zone as he grabbed the ball, so he gets a fair amount of leeway to roll into the end zone.
  22. Warren was really the 6th starter out of camp, right? Yes, forgot about him. Similar logic applies, although Warren was better as a starter. On the topic of rotation depth, Texas is hoping Ross can be good to go by the stretch run. He was not an answer to any questions. http://www.star-telegram.com/sports/mlb/texas-rangers/article127532574.html
  23. Our 6th and 7th starters last year were Wood and Cahill. Both had good 2015's but only as relievers, so we aren't really talking about a super high bar. Especially if the front office believes at all in Zastryzny's MLB performance, whatshisname the Rule 5 pick, etc.
  24. You get the audience you ask for, I guess. The Fangraphs list was a very good read. Interesting that he was especially bullish on Candelario's bat and especially bearish on his defense, and that description of Eloy's bat is drool-worthy. Rosario at #10 is proof positive that it's basically ignoring anything that isn't a scouting perspective, but it's still fine if you understand that lens.
  25. If you'll forgive me being pedantic I think it's probably similarly likely that it's a trade+develop situation, a la Arrieta. Of course given the timing that means the trade+develop has to be Montgomery or someone who is added before opening day so maybe not exactly likely, but I wouldn't undersell the possibility of trading for a guy and fixing them.
×
×
  • Create New...