Could it be possible that the Cubs are holding Schwarber behind the plate to keep his value high as can be? As a catcher, Schwarber's bat is more valuable than any prospect in the game - IF another team believes he can be that guy behind the plate. He came up and took advantage of the week he had at the big league level. You're in the GM seat: Would you give up Schwarber in a trade for Hamels? It might hurt a bit later, but it's something to consider. As much as us Cubs fans want to say "I'll give up Baez, Almora, and Vogelbach for Hamels." That's great - there's a reason you're willing to trade those players - they don't have much value. I'll play GM and probably get torn apart for it: Schwarber and Baez for Hamels, Papelbon, Andres Blanco We lose a couple big pieces but we aren't just trading for a rental in Hamels - we are getting a star pitcher. With Rizzo, Bryant, Castro, Russell, Soler - the Cubs could do something like this, next offseason you sign a Price and a good outfield bat - you have a good size payroll, but you 3 very good starters this year, 4 next year.. A deeper bench and bullpen this year, and if you can grab a good bat next year, you are set with a good farm system still coming up. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk