And that's not even true. 8/4/3 is "more" money than 3/4/8. Consider, also, that with the backloaded deal, should we try to trade him, say, in the third year of his deal, we'll save more money. For instance, with a 3/4/8 setup, we pay him $7 million the first two years and then trade him and eat, say, half of his third year's money. That leaves us paying a total of $11 million for him. If we set up the contract as 8/4/3, then we pay $12 million up front and, in the same scenario, we pay half his third year salary. In that instance, we pay a total of $13.5 million for him. That may be what you're talking about, but I thought I'd point it out. He was talking about the time value of money.