Garwilly

The Cubs are 14-6 when the game page reaches 50 pages. 8/14 W 8/11 W 7/26 L 7/25 W 7/24 W 7/23 W 7/22 L 7/21 L 7/19 W 6/11 W 6/2 W 6/1 W 5/31 W 5/27 W 5/24 W 5/9 L 4/25 W 4/15 L 4/10 W 4/8 L

50 bucks to whoever shuts up the 12 yearold by the microphone.

He's still gay. Just kidding, you and the writer are correct, rivalries and sports are dumb. Just kidding again, seriously.

With the talk from Dusty a month ago of retirement, do you think the cubs let maddux walk? The Cubs have no say in the matter. did you not see the bold quote??? it appears maddux is giving the cubs an out...obviously with a buyout so which would you take, a buyout or maddux? I read the quote, and I read it in he Suntimes this morning. Regardless, the Cubs have no say in the matter. There is no buy out. Maddux certainly has the right to retire, but the Cubs are in no position to make a unilateral move to keep him from the 2006 roster. You asked if the Cubs let Maddux walk, and it is quite simple, it is not their call. well I read it two hours ago, this morning, and last night....WHAT?? anyway, the cubs could certainly talk to maddux about restructuring, retirement, or a buyout. 2 out of those three the cubs would have a 50% call in....that is what I'm asking about, why so snooty? No snoot on my part. You came up with "did you not see the bold quote??? " The point is Maddux doesnt have to talk to them at all. It is up to him if he wishes to do that favor for the Cubs. It has nothing to do with your original question, which is what I answered. Can the Cubs let Maddux walk? Again, no. Can Maddux voluntarily give up money for next season? Well sure. Do not be confused as to whose court the ball is in though.

With the talk from Dusty a month ago of retirement, do you think the cubs let maddux walk? The Cubs have no say in the matter. did you not see the bold quote??? it appears maddux is giving the cubs an out...obviously with a buyout so which would you take, a buyout or maddux? I read the quote, and I read it in he Suntimes this morning. Regardless, the Cubs have no say in the matter. There is no buy out. Maddux certainly has the right to retire, but the Cubs are in no position to make a unilateral move to keep him from the 2006 roster. You asked if the Cubs let Maddux walk, and it is quite simple, it is not their call.

With the talk from Dusty a month ago of retirement, do you think the cubs let maddux walk? The Cubs have no say in the matter.

The boat fell.

I'm going to laugh if Rusch throws a perfect game after coming in slumping, and get a no-no before guys like Prior, Wood, Z or Maddux did. Bud Smith no-no in SD memories

I've been saying it the whole game (and I am one of the guys who wont say it). And now I keep saying it because I feel it is a reverse luck thing. Baseball players and fans are so rediculously supersticious.

They delayed a minor league game a while when Jeff Liefer got stuck in a stall.

Since we're all claiming stuff now, I have a Keery Wood 98 ROY Pepsi can. I saved three, dropped one a couple years ago, drank one last year on accident, and have one left.

We have a winner, I think? No, Neely wins. I submitted mine with 4 and 11 accidentally switched. Neely had posted his fully correct before I could swap mine.

http://cgi.ebay.com/Burger-King-Cubs-ear-radio-battery-operated_W0QQitemZ7165074339QQcategoryZ20168QQssPageNameZWD1VQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem#ebayphotohosting

Complete game Shut out! clap calp clap clap clap Complete game Shut out! clap calp clap clap clap

1. Air it out L. To hit a ball a long distance, or to pitch a ball very fast 2. Banana stick J. Bat made of poor quality/soft wood 3. Can of corn C. An easily played fly ball 4. Daniel Webster M. The bounce or liveliness of a ball 5. Greenfly A. A female baseball groupie 6. Iron Mike E. An automated pitching machine 7. Keystone I. Second base 8. Men in blue N. The umpires 9. Nightcap K. 2nd game of a double header 10. Pancake F. A thinly padded flat glove preferred by some infielders 11. Rabbit G. A player known for arguing with umpires 12. Soupbone D. A pitchers arm 13. The table is set H. Bases loaded 14. Worm burner B. A hit ball that skims the ground

So $1015 will translate into how many gallons next week? 12? 14?

Furcal and Giles

Why is that interesting? That means he's at the bottom of the barrell. 10 of 16 is not bottom of the barrell, it is by no means good, but not bottom of the barrell.

I'm sorry, I was unaware this board was lacking in Corey bashing. The point is there is a discussion of guys who haven'r produced and his name isn't being mentioned. Give me a break. Why does Perez merit greater bashing than patterson? Topic of the hour? Not every discussionhas to be about Corey. This one for instance, is about the Niefster. Some of the people on this board have an unbelievable double standard. Are you talking about me? If so, please enlighten me....otherwise, carryon.

Lead off hit, think Lowe can finish the job on 27 straight outs?

I'm sorry, I was unaware this board was lacking in Corey bashing. The point is there is a discussion of guys who haven'r produced and his name isn't being mentioned. Give me a break. Why does Perez merit greater bashing than patterson? Topic of the hour? Not every discussionhas to be about Corey. This one for instance, is about the Niefster.

Cubs game! Cubs game! Cubs game! Cubs game! Cubs game! Cubs game! Cubs game! Cubs game! Cubs game! Cubs game! Cubs game! Cubs game! 8)

=D>

I always thought I would throw a decoy, but in the moment there was no way I would switch. Too exciting!

I thought Edwards HR went through the bottom of the basket and was actually resting on the top of the ivy? That is true, but I took it back. The ball was in the basket, and then a big guy leaned on the net, it then fell onto the ivy. After they could not reach it, I stretched over and was able to get it. I came up firing. Nueby tivo'ed it, and said they showed it on the ivy, but cut away before the throw. Listen to the crowd and I am sure they could be heard.