While my "buzz off" statement was hyperbole and I don't necessarily think that is what happened, my point is that we really don't know what did happen. Just having no reports about something is not necessarily the same thing as saying that it didn't happen. "Absence of proof is not proof of absence." I disagree that evaluating FA talent is the main part of his job. Hendry never markets himself, and, to my knowledge, neither does anyone else, that he is a good evaluator of FA talent. His main credentials are that he is a very good guy in getting things for trades. He is rarely fleeced and has often fleeced opposing teams. Badger, I don't know that the Sosa trade was that bad. Would the team have been better with Sosa than with Hairston, I don't know about that. Some have argued that he could have gotten more for Sosa, but I don't know that that makes this a "bad trade." You are correct about the Cruz trade and the Farnsworth trade (but the Cruz trade for what we got back was FAR worse). Finally: It is part of the beauty of baseball that we can discuss these things in the off-season. What I still want to stress is that this is all guess-work. To discuss them as "educated guesses" (as one poster pointed out) is fun, interesting and valid. Where I think we cross the line is when we start to give these "educated guesses" the apparent status of "fact" with statements like "Hendry did/did not go after Giles." A good argument can be made that he didn't, but there is really little evidence (much less "proof") that he did/did not. Well devaluing Sosa to the point where GM's knew they didn't have to offer ANYONE to get him was Hendry's mistake. Just as they are doing with Walker now. I don't get why they devalue certain players. As I said, all his great trades are with players who weren't devalued.