Tree, the choice is between a young bad and an older, veteran bad. Why go with the older bad? because sometimes a change is in order? plus, you cant do worse than a 0 rating. Change for changes sake isn't always the right decision. If Matt Murton goes 2-23 over the course of a few games, is it right to yank him and play Angel Pagan? Of course it isn't. Young players go through bad stretches. You stick with him. You need to actually commit to developing a player, and not ditch him as soon as adversity happens. There's a huge difference between a slump/bad play as a hitter compared to a slump/bad play as a quarterback.