Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Butterscup1679666578

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    30,292
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Butterscup1679666578

  1. go cards/ravens
  2. I never even thought about the 2010 draft. My mind is changed.
  3. Jackson didn't even catch it. ? If it's a good throw it's caught in stride. Sorry, I should have edited it. My attempt was to agree with ELCABALLO that with a good throw Rivers has a TD. As it turned out, though, Jackson didn't even catch it. That make more sense? Haha yes.
  4. Jackson didn't even catch it. ? If it's a good throw it's caught in stride.
  5. Of what, having sex with Tebow? Tell you what, if I get that job at Florida next year, I'll try and hook you up.
  6. You should feel just the opposite. Well, the injury history in general doesn't bother me, but I guess it does bother me because he's a Type A. If he was healthy and a Type A it'd be different of course, or if he had injury history and wasn't a Type A it'd be ok, but I guess a combination of both makes it a bad idea to sign him.
  7. Well I'm gonna be out of the 2 Strikes Pool I'm in because the Giants suck at calling plays.
  8. Injury history doesn't bother me. The fact that he is a Type A who got offered arby does.
  9. Mizzou's about to lose again to Nebraska yay.
  10. Randy Wolf would be the worst possible outcome of all of this. Should've just kept Marquis if you're going to get Wolf.
  11. Missouri showing some life. Within six.
  12. Man these refs just don't like calling fouls when our big guys get hacked.
  13. We're definitely getting called for every little thing. Too bad we suck anyways.
  14. Missouri is not going to score against Nebraska today. We never beat that team.
  15. I'd like this. Was he hurt or something last year? I was just wondering why his numbers spiked up so dramatically from the previous 3 years.
  16. you could save yourself a lot of time and just read the thread title or like, espn.com With this logic there should only be one thread that everyone posts everything in. If something is extra important, the thread title could be changed to reflect it at some point later. I really don't mind for the most part but I think it is a little hard to argue that a thread about Peavy shouldn't be about Peavy. There also has been information about Peavy after page 147 so reading the thread title really doesn't cut it. Nothing really as "important" as what Levine said though.
  17. So I shouldn't expect to read Peavy dicussions when I open the "Levine Upgrades Peavy Deal to "Alive"" thread? Just so I'm clear... Carry on with your bickering over the Reds future in whatever thread you feel comfortable. What new could there be to discuss that hasn't been discussed in the past 160 pages?
  18. That's why the title is always updated with the most recent "major" news.
  19. They were saying in one of the mock drafts we had a shot at him right? I think he'll end up somewhere around that 15-20 range, so he could be there for our taking if Angelo/Lovie want him. The only thing that scares me is he might not be big enough to be the big receiver we need and like Bennett will get benched all season Well if Lovie's benching a top-20 talent because he's not 6-4 220 lbs, then we've got more problems than we thought.
×
×
  • Create New...