While I agree with what he's saying, and while I don't believe Levine, I'd believe what Levine had to say every single time over Olney. I don't get what Olney has to do with any of this. Did you not read the whole e-mail? He says it's hard to believe that Levine would have info over "Rosenthal, Olney, Heyman, and the beat guy from each city." While I agree that I don't think Levine has any info here, if Levine came out with a report that no one else had, or Olney came out with a report that no one else had, I'd believe Levine every time over guys like Olney. Just because Levine isn't a "big time" ESPN guy doesn't mean he can't have info. No I read the whole e-mail, I just think you're putting too much into what he said. He wasn't even saying Olney was more reliable or better than Levine. Olney was just an example and probably just a name that came to his mind. His point was if what Levine is saying is true, SOMEBODY else would have picked up on it by now. He's not saying Olney specifically would have picked up on it by now, he's saying that at least one of the hundred of guys who cover this stuff would have heard about it by now if Levine has. You're right, I probably am reading too much into it.